Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Sports_Freak said:

Must win. If we win, does anyone think it may be a good idea to give Skubal an extra day of rest and use him against Baltimore? Those 3 games are going to be a....challenge.

No. Save him for the playoff game.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Baseball reference has Parker Meadows at 1.4 WAR for the season. It seems like it should be higher but I don't know much about stats. Is 1.4 good?

I don't look at baseball reference but on Fangraphs he was pretty much at zero and he has raised it the last two months. If he could do the same production over six months he would have 4+ WAR.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Tigermojo said:

I don't look at baseball reference but on Fangraphs he was pretty much at zero and he has raised it the last two months. If he could do the same production over six months he would have 4+ WAR.

And yet the Tigers are close to 20 games over .500 with him in the lineup but about 20 games under when he's not. I guess I don't understand that stat.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

And yet the Tigers are close to 20 games over .500 with him in the lineup but about 20 games under when he's not. I guess I don't understand that stat.

Meadows was not the only guy out of the lineup over most of that period and Maeda was still in the rotation etc.,

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

And yet the Tigers are close to 20 games over .500 with him in the lineup but about 20 games under when he's not. I guess I don't understand that stat.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but WAR is wins above replacement. A roster full of replacement level players would win about 48 games so WAR adds to that total. Not directly because there is luck involved but WAR is usually close to a team's Pythagorean record.

Posted
1 minute ago, Tigermojo said:

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but WAR is wins above replacement. A roster full of replacement level players would win about 48 games so WAR adds to that total. Not directly because there is luck involved but WAR is usually close to a team's Pythagorean record.

it won't always line up that well. A team full of zero WAR guys should be under 500 but  you also see teams further over 500 than their total player WAR.

Posted
Just now, gehringer_2 said:

it won't always line up that well. A team full of zero WAR guys should be under 500 but  you also see teams further over 500 than their total player WAR.

Right but don't they say 40-50 team war should be a playoff team because it's wins above the base of 48.

Posted
6 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

it won't always line up that well. A team full of zero WAR guys should be under 500 but  you also see teams further over 500 than their total player WAR.

A .500 team theoretically would have 33 WAR.  

Posted

Imagine if Mize and Tork were studs worthy of their draft position. This team would be so much more exciting. I guess we got Skubal, but man it’s hard to overcome multiple busts like that in a single rebuild. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      291
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...