Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Deleterious said:

A team like OKC would give you multiple 1st round picks for Luka even if it was just a 1 1/2 year rental.  

Wait until the draft lottery is figured out and approach the top teams then.

A trade to Detroit for Ivey, Holland, cap filler and multiple picks was better than the Laker move.  

So odd.

And they were calling it a "win now" move after trading Luka freaking Doncic. I just don't know what's going on here.

Posted

The oddest part of all of this.  Nico Harrison has been an excellent GM the past two seasons.  Drafting Lively was perfect, trading for Gafford trigged that 17 game win streak or whatever it was.  Finally sticking a team with Hardaway.  Bringing in Grimes, Thompson, and Marshall this summer was fantastic.  This move doesn't track with anything else he has done.  He is considered a good GM overall.  

Posted
23 minutes ago, Deleterious said:

The oddest part of all of this.  Nico Harrison has been an excellent GM the past two seasons.  Drafting Lively was perfect, trading for Gafford trigged that 17 game win streak or whatever it was.  Finally sticking a team with Hardaway.  Bringing in Grimes, Thompson, and Marshall this summer was fantastic.  This move doesn't track with anything else he has done.  He is considered a good GM overall.  

he's not a stupid gm (this isnt troy weaver were talking about), so there's a reason they did it.

luka is fat, happy, and injured.  lakers must assume he wont be zion 2.0.  if he can put down the burger king this will be one of the bigger trade heists in a long time.  

and its funny that they would trade luka because he's hurt all the time and acquire.....ANTHONY DAVIS.  why not just deal for kwahi leonard while youre at it?

Posted
29 minutes ago, buddha said:

he's not a stupid gm (this isnt troy weaver were talking about), so there's a reason they did it.

luka is fat, happy, and injured.  lakers must assume he wont be zion 2.0.  if he can put down the burger king this will be one of the bigger trade heists in a long time.  

and its funny that they would trade luka because he's hurt all the time and acquire.....ANTHONY DAVIS.  why not just deal for kwahi leonard while youre at it?

I think I would feel better if they had received more in return.  Like you pointed out, there are viable reasons to move him.

Posted

If AD was 4 years younger then I would’ve got this trade. I still wouldn’t have done it but it would be explainable.    

How bad is this going to look when AD is 36 and completely broken and Luca is in his prime years.  

Maybe Nico hates his boss and everything she stands for but that’s a conversation for the political forum. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Deleterious said:

Poor bastard will have to survive on 5/$296M.  Hope he doesn't take his vape pen to Russia.

 

This a 25 year old in his gamer prime.  No vape pens. He must have a dab kit that looks like a college Chemistry lab. 

Posted
7 hours ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Possibly the worst trade in sports history.  How is that all you get for Luka?

I don't know.  The Yankees acquiring Ruth for diddlyfreakingpooh was a bit of a one sided thing.

Posted

Sam Vecenie brought up a point on his podcast last night.  Not only did Dallas not shop Luka around the league and get the best deal, they didn't even get the best offer from LA.

He said how do you send Luka to LA and not get Austin Reaves?  The Lakers have one more 1st round pick they can trade.  How did Dallas not get that?

Posted
Just now, Deleterious said:

Sam Vecenie brought up a point on his podcast last night.  Not only did Dallas not shop Luka around the league and get the best deal, they didn't even get the best offer from LA.

He said how do you send Luka to LA and not get Austin Reaves?  The Lakers have one more 1st round pick they can trade.  How did Dallas not get that?

Were they afraid that word would leak quickly that Doncic wasn't going to resign and that might lower his trade value?  Even then, they've still got to play the field against each other to get the best deal.

Posted

Given that everyone seems to hate this trade for the Mavs, they will probably be considered the winner of the trade 5 years from now.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, casimir said:

Were they afraid that word would leak quickly that Doncic wasn't going to resign and that might lower his trade value?  Even then, they've still got to play the field against each other to get the best deal.

My guess is they were cowards and didn't want it to get out in case it didn't work out.

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, NYLion said:

Even if the writing is on the wall and Luka wanted out, how do you only get old AD and a 1st? Ridiculous and of course it's the Lakers reaping the benefits as they have for like 6 decades always getting these generational talents landing in their lap.

Yep, Kobe for an aging Divac, Gasol for Kwame Brown and some picks, AD for Lonzo and Ingram and now this. And this is all in just the past 30 years, I'm sure there were countless examples before and others I'm forgetting about. 

Not to mention they almost got a prime Chris Paul for relative peanuts if not for the owners actually stepping in and forcing Stern to veto it, if I'm remembering the details correctly.

Edited by RandyMarsh

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      289
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...