Trumps Presidency 2025

[mtutiger]

2 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Asshat

The French, British and many other NATO countries have died on our behalf in Afghanistan. Estonia in particular who was elevated in the early oughts saw many more deaths per capita than other NATO members, all because they wanted the protection that NATO offered given their next door neighborhood.

There isn't a hell hot enough for this guy

[Tigermojo]

What he really means is he wouldn't help any of them which he has proven with Ukraine. Projection as usual. That's the thing with narcissists. Once you know what they are, they are so predictable.

Your country is going to get so screwed in any negotiation because all they have to do is offer something shiny that makes Trump look good or strokes his ego and it's an immediate yes without checking any of the fine print.

[Tiger337]

2 hours ago, ewsieg said:

So yeah, if climate change is your thing and the Dems aren't doing enough for you, I guess vote MAGA and let's see how that works out for you.

Or maybe they vote for nobody.  

[Tigerbomb13]

54 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

 

Hahahaha this surely won’t backfire or anything. 

[Motown Bombers]

9 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

Or maybe they vote for nobody.  

And then they get Trump. If they don't want to participate, then they get everything coming to them. 

[smr-nj]

I thought I’d lighten the mood a bit. 

[LaceyLou]

2 minutes ago, smr-nj said:

I thought I’d lighten the mood a bit. 

LOL. Sadly I'll bet people think that's what a transgenic mouse is, though.

[Tiger337]

7 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

And then they get Trump. If they don't want to participate, then they get everything coming to them. 

If they are one issue climate change voters, then they think we are doomed either way.  

[CMRivdogs]

Waiting for the announcement that Camp Peary will be turned into a theme park

[Hongbit]

2 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

Boom boom bossman. 

 

Not since Carrey & Daniels have we seen someone as Dumb & Dumber.

Edited Thursday at 11:42 PM by Hongbit

[Tigerbomb13]

What if it landed on Mar-a-lago

[mtutiger]

5 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said:

What if it landed on Mar-a-lago

God believes in metaphors

[CMRivdogs]

14 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said:

What if it landed on Mar-a-lago

I wonder how many people who have cruise ship reservations for Friday morning are pissed off because their flight into Miami or Fort Lauderdale has either been cancelled or delayed til Friday.

[chasfh]

I’m supposed to fly into West Palm tomorrow. And here I was crowing about the idea that there was no chance the plane would run into a military helicopter on descent, because Mar-a-lago. 

Edited Friday at 03:02 AM by chasfh

[Motown Bombers]

 

[smr-nj]

1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

I wonder how many people who have cruise ship reservations for Friday morning are pissed off because their flight into Miami or Fort Lauderdale has either been cancelled or delayed til Friday.

Well, wouldn’t there be concerned that the space debris is also falling in the waters around there? Seems like there should be.

[mtutiger]

[ewsieg]

4 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

I wonder how many people who have cruise ship reservations for Friday morning are pissed off because their flight into Miami or Fort Lauderdale has either been cancelled or delayed til Friday.

I'm sure there are some.  But, as we all know, if something goes wrong in your life, it's Obama's fault.

[mtutiger]

[Tigerbomb13]

The GOP stance of Marie Antoinette-ing us is really something. A bunch of billionaires telling us we are going to feel pain.

Edited Friday at 01:24 PM by Tigerbomb13

[Motown Bombers]

Recall how Biden got shredded for the mere suggestion that inflation was coming down. 

[ewsieg]

9 hours ago, pfife said:

Harris didnt run on pro DEI whatsoever.

You are correct on Harris, she only ran on 'she's not Trump', which was good enough for me, but not enough.  Overall the pendulum swung way left within our electorate on DEI, which folks on both sides recognizing it went too far.  That said, the Dem party expressed no concerns and openly endorsed DEI with no faults.  They ignored news that identified concerns regarding DEI overload and blew off concerns. 

And in true political form, the side that recognized the pendulum was way off, used it to their advantage and no longer cares about evening out that pendulum, they are swaying it as far as they can the other way, potentially wiping out many good aspects of DEI.  

In the end there is always going to be a balance between appeasing the far end of your party and trying to make sure they turn out and vote for you, and also keeping a message out that invites independents to vote for you as well. 

The GOP, for all the faults of Trump, their far right will vote for him regardless.  They don't have the problem the Dem party has with their far left.

[Motown Bombers]

6 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

You are correct on Harris, she only ran on 'she's not Trump', which was good enough for me, but not enough.  Overall the pendulum swung way left within our electorate on DEI, which folks on both sides recognizing it went too far.  That said, the Dem party expressed no concerns and openly endorsed DEI with no faults.  They ignored news that identified concerns regarding DEI overload and blew off concerns. 

And in true political form, the side that recognized the pendulum was way off, used it to their advantage and no longer cares about evening out that pendulum, they are swaying it as far as they can the other way, potentially wiping out many good aspects of DEI.  

In the end there is always going to be a balance between appeasing the far end of your party and trying to make sure they turn out and vote for you, and also keeping a message out that invites independents to vote for you as well. 

The GOP, for all the faults of Trump, their far right will vote for him regardless.  They don't have the problem the Dem party has with their far left.

She ran on bringing down housing costs. She had a plan to provide down payment assistance and build millions of new housing. She ran on expanding Medicaid to cover the sandwich generation. She also ran on holding price gougers accountable. She didn't just run on not Trump. 

[ewsieg]

2 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

She ran on bringing down housing costs. She had a plan to provide down payment assistance and build millions of new housing. She ran on expanding Medicaid to cover the sandwich generation. She also ran on holding price gougers accountable. She didn't just run on not Trump. 

Well, good thing she wasn't good candidate then, otherwise she would have been completely blown out of the water.  If I was voting based on her 'housing' plan, I probably would have voted for Trump too. 

[Motown Bombers]

Just now, ewsieg said:

Well, good thing she wasn't good candidate then, otherwise she would have been completely blown out of the water.  If I was voting based on her 'housing' plan, I probably would have voted for Trump too. 

Because lowering the cost of housing is bad?