Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/6/2025 at 9:32 PM, romad1 said:

Asshat

Expand  

The French, British and many other NATO countries have died on our behalf in Afghanistan. Estonia in particular who was elevated in the early oughts saw many more deaths per capita than other NATO members, all because they wanted the protection that NATO offered given their next door neighborhood.

There isn't a hell hot enough for this guy

Posted

What he really means is he wouldn't help any of them which he has proven with Ukraine. Projection as usual. That's the thing with narcissists. Once you know what they are, they are so predictable.

Your country is going to get so screwed in any negotiation because all they have to do is offer something shiny that makes Trump look good or strokes his ego and it's an immediate yes without checking any of the fine print.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
  On 3/7/2025 at 1:21 AM, Tigerbomb13 said:

What if it landed on Mar-a-lago

Expand  

I wonder how many people who have cruise ship reservations for Friday morning are pissed off because their flight into Miami or Fort Lauderdale has either been cancelled or delayed til Friday.

Posted (edited)

I’m supposed to fly into West Palm tomorrow. And here I was crowing about the idea that there was no chance the plane would run into a military helicopter on descent, because Mar-a-lago. 

Edited by chasfh
Posted
  On 3/7/2025 at 1:38 AM, CMRivdogs said:

I wonder how many people who have cruise ship reservations for Friday morning are pissed off because their flight into Miami or Fort Lauderdale has either been cancelled or delayed til Friday.

Expand  

Well, wouldn’t there be concerned that the space debris is also falling in the waters around there? Seems like there should be.

Posted
  On 3/7/2025 at 1:38 AM, CMRivdogs said:

I wonder how many people who have cruise ship reservations for Friday morning are pissed off because their flight into Miami or Fort Lauderdale has either been cancelled or delayed til Friday.

Expand  

I'm sure there are some.  But, as we all know, if something goes wrong in your life, it's Obama's fault.

Posted
  On 3/6/2025 at 8:36 PM, pfife said:

Harris didnt run on pro DEI whatsoever.

Expand  

You are correct on Harris, she only ran on 'she's not Trump', which was good enough for me, but not enough.  Overall the pendulum swung way left within our electorate on DEI, which folks on both sides recognizing it went too far.  That said, the Dem party expressed no concerns and openly endorsed DEI with no faults.  They ignored news that identified concerns regarding DEI overload and blew off concerns. 

And in true political form, the side that recognized the pendulum was way off, used it to their advantage and no longer cares about evening out that pendulum, they are swaying it as far as they can the other way, potentially wiping out many good aspects of DEI.  

In the end there is always going to be a balance between appeasing the far end of your party and trying to make sure they turn out and vote for you, and also keeping a message out that invites independents to vote for you as well. 

The GOP, for all the faults of Trump, their far right will vote for him regardless.  They don't have the problem the Dem party has with their far left.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/7/2025 at 3:42 PM, ewsieg said:

You are correct on Harris, she only ran on 'she's not Trump', which was good enough for me, but not enough.  Overall the pendulum swung way left within our electorate on DEI, which folks on both sides recognizing it went too far.  That said, the Dem party expressed no concerns and openly endorsed DEI with no faults.  They ignored news that identified concerns regarding DEI overload and blew off concerns. 

And in true political form, the side that recognized the pendulum was way off, used it to their advantage and no longer cares about evening out that pendulum, they are swaying it as far as they can the other way, potentially wiping out many good aspects of DEI.  

In the end there is always going to be a balance between appeasing the far end of your party and trying to make sure they turn out and vote for you, and also keeping a message out that invites independents to vote for you as well. 

The GOP, for all the faults of Trump, their far right will vote for him regardless.  They don't have the problem the Dem party has with their far left.

Expand  

She ran on bringing down housing costs. She had a plan to provide down payment assistance and build millions of new housing. She ran on expanding Medicaid to cover the sandwich generation. She also ran on holding price gougers accountable. She didn't just run on not Trump. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 3/7/2025 at 3:50 PM, Motown Bombers said:

She ran on bringing down housing costs. She had a plan to provide down payment assistance and build millions of new housing. She ran on expanding Medicaid to cover the sandwich generation. She also ran on holding price gougers accountable. She didn't just run on not Trump. 

Expand  

Well, good thing she wasn't good candidate then, otherwise she would have been completely blown out of the water.  If I was voting based on her 'housing' plan, I probably would have voted for Trump too. 

Posted
  On 3/7/2025 at 3:55 PM, ewsieg said:

Well, good thing she wasn't good candidate then, otherwise she would have been completely blown out of the water.  If I was voting based on her 'housing' plan, I probably would have voted for Trump too. 

Expand  

Because lowering the cost of housing is bad? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...