Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, RatkoVarda said:

this is like asking me what Scott Harris should do. HE'S the MLB guy, not me, but....

1. Hold a press conference every day about Trump and Musk's corruption. Need to spoon feed the media something every day. that is why they cover Trump. Every day he gives them a story on a platter they do not need to work for.

2. Put Crockett, Jeffries and other young people out there who have the instincts and energy to fight. Eff norms.

3. Throw sh\t at the wall every day and see what sticks - run with that. Remember there is no penalty for lying, so don't worry too much about the truth.

4. Talk EVERY day about how TRUMP'S high prices, TRUMP'S corruption, TRUMP'S incompetence effect ordinary people (like FEMA's inability to respond in the Carolinas). Don't focus on his stupidity and cruelness and amorality - no one effing cares. Focus on how those things hurt Americans.

5. They need to play the media game a lot better, and they need to give the American people the entertainment they demand from politics. Competence is frankly irrelevant.

6. "Donald Trump continues to hurt ordinary Americans by ...." is how they should start every sentence.

edit 7. AND I want a steady diet of "Billionaire Welfare Queen Elon Musk controls the President." I think that clearly resonates with a huge number of Americans.

It doesn’t seem like #3 should be necessary as there is plenty of actual evidence that Trump is unfit for office.  But here we are.

We’re simply screwed until he croaks.

Posted
2 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

I agree the Dems are being way too passive.  

That's why MAGA stole the election...for complete control. This is a VERY scary time. And to be honest, I used to laugh at conspiracy theorists. Was the election "stollen" (sic) from Trump in 2020? No, Biden won. Was the election stolen from Harris in '24? She was filling up stadiums, had every big name endorsement (Taylor Swift) while that orange turd had....Ted Nugent. And he won every swing state? Yeah, I don't think so.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

That's why MAGA stole the election...for complete control. This is a VERY scary time. And to be honest, I used to laugh at conspiracy theorists. Was the election "stollen" (sic) from Trump in 2020? No, Biden won. Was the election stolen from Harris in '24? She was filling up stadiums, had every big name endorsement (Taylor Swift) while that orange turd had....Ted Nugent. And he won every swing state? Yeah, I don't think so.

Knowing Trump, he probably did try to cheat, but I have no evidence that he cheated or whether it affected the outcome.  Thus, I am not going to assert that he did.  There was no evidence of cheating in 2020 either.  Even his hand picked Supreme Court rejected the claims.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiger337 said:

Knowing Trump, he probably did try to cheat, but I have no evidence that he cheated or whether it affected the outcome.  Thus, I am not going to assert that he did.  There was no evidence of cheating in 2020 either.  Even his hand picked Supreme Court rejected the claims.  

I suppose there's no evidence of Putin ever cheating either. Donald Trump projects his crimes by accusing others of things he's guilty of. And he spent over 4 years complaining the 2020 was rigged and he was cheated. Do I think he was the mastermind? No way, he's an idiot. But look at Musk, he seems to have a very important position. Pretty suspicious. They found a way to cheat that didn't leave any evidence.

Posted

When will people realize that there is a very thin line, and sometimes no line at all, between the 'well they did this!' response to an issue.

Seems like today's right wing response to this leaked text is 'but Hillary's emails!'.

Aren't you kind of saying that issue, which you felt was such a big deal before, is no longer a big deal?  Or if you're trying to compare it, aren't you admitting this is a big deal?   I don't get it.

Posted
8 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

When will people realize that there is a very thin line, and sometimes no line at all, between the 'well they did this!' response to an issue.

Seems like today's right wing response to this leaked text is 'but Hillary's emails!'.

Aren't you kind of saying that issue, which you felt was such a big deal before, is no longer a big deal?  Or if you're trying to compare it, aren't you admitting this is a big deal?   I don't get it.

Those e-mails likely cost her the election.  She seemed to be cruising to victory until the FBI brought them up again shorly before the election.  

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

Those e-mails likely cost her the election.  She seemed to be cruising to victory until the FBI brought them up again shorly before the election.  

In my opinion, which all of MAGA agrees with me on, is that was a big deal.  So by comparing this to that, aren't you saying it's just as big of a deal?

Edited by ewsieg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...