Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Umm

Fyi if you think you can mts post drunk you actually cant

Youre welcome

Edited by pfife
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

I am trying to keep up.

Try reading the posts its very clear

Are you drunk posting again

Edited by pfife
Posted
Just now, Tigeraholic1 said:

I am trying to keep up. Are we pissed that Mullin was calling out the hypocrisy or that Pete sailed through today or just both?

I wouldn't say I'm pissed about anything really. I just think Markwayne's argument is really idiotic and, frankly, should be a little insulting to those of us in our professional and personal lives who do the right things.

Posted

remember that one jabroni congrassman a few years back that spilled the beans about the unified reich coke parties?  markwayne flying close to the sun

Posted

On the personal lives front, it's particularly wild to see Markwayne explaining away Pete's marital infidelity given how much I heard about "moral relativism" from my conservative family members growing up. 

Ephesians 5:25 is for the birds apparently lol

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

I wouldn't say I'm pissed about anything really. I just think Markwayne's argument is really idiotic and, frankly, should be a little insulting to those of us in our professional and personal lives who do the right things.

Go work at a GM, Ford plant and see the dope smoking and drinking, kill popping that happens. There are hundreds of divorce lawyers in every city. Politicians are human too. 

Edited by Tigeraholic1
Posted
1 minute ago, mtutiger said:

On the personal lives front, it's particularly wild to see Markwayne explaining away Pete's marital infidelity given how much I heard about "moral relativism" from my conservative family members growing up. 

Ephesians 5:25 is for the birds apparently lol

yeah we've had that fight here way back in the day too but it's been a long time.  I've obvs had a ton of fights on here over the years but I fought really bad with shabba on that one we were going to murder each other but it's ok b/c as markwayne would say everyone murders 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Go work at a GM, Ford plant and see

CommunityNote - he's going to work as the leader of the pentagon but cool comparison to GM and FORD I guess 

You already admitted you're trying to keep up but how about trying harder 

Edited by pfife
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Go work at a GM, Ford plant and see the dope smoking and drinking, kill popping that happens. 

Pete Hegseth, who is neither qualified for the job and who has a documented history of drug and alcohol abuse, should be confirmed because of things that may happen at GM and Ford plants?

Just really really unconvincing stuff....

Edited by mtutiger
Posted (edited)

In the history of this forum, the one thing we always all agreed on regardless of our political views.... it was a hammer of logic... was that our leaders and elected officials were by default held to higher standards than regular joes.  

The only ones that don't understand that are maga

probably because they know their leaders don't meet that standard

markwayne and magholicommunitynote1 have already admitted it tonight

 

Edited by pfife
Posted
6 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Pete Hegseth, who is neither qualified for the job and who has a documented history of drug and alcohol abuse, should be confirmed because of things that may happen at GM and Ford plants?

Just really really unconvincing stuff....

Where is the evidence Pete did anything along these lines and why was it not shown as evidence to disqualify him? They didn’t because they had none. It was just a smear campaign that had no legs.

I was using those examples of everyday people who make mistakes. It’s not condemnation just in observation.

Posted
6 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

Just curious, do you consider Caitlyn Jenner a man or woman and what bathroom should he/she use

The left is the party of science correct? Follow the science.

Posted
14 minutes ago, pfife said:

In the history of this forum, the one thing we always all agreed on regardless of our political views.... it was a hammer of logic... was that our leaders and elected officials were by default held to higher standards than regular joes.  

 

President Joe pardoned his son lol. Guess that standard went out the window.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Where is the evidence Pete did anything along these lines and why was it not shown as evidence to disqualify him? They didn’t because they had none. It was just a smear campaign that had no legs.

The reports from his Fox News colleagues are out there... Along with his own comments on his drinking, which alludes to this being a real issue for him (via NYT): 

In an interview on Megyn Kelly’s SiriusXM show last month, Mr. Hegseth acknowledged concerns about his drinking had put his nomination at risk. He promised then that there “won’t be a drop of alcohol on my lips” if he is confirmed.

I don't have any reason to doubt any of it. Although the ultimate disqualification is his lack of experience and resume to run the Pentagon. Given that he apparently hasn't run a damn thing in his life. The questions of his demons, not mention the martial infidelity and sexual assault allegations, are just extra kindling on the fire

Edited by mtutiger
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

President Joe pardoned his son lol. Guess that standard went out the window.

You voted for him and also the pardon was objectively the correct decision.  You already lost this argument multiple times.   Are you drunk posting again like everyone

Posted

If he cant or wont honor an oath to his wife why would anyone expect him to honor an oath of service

Must be drunk to expect that from a drunk

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

The reports from his Fox News colleagues are out there... Along with his own comments on his drinking, which alludes to this being a real issue for him (via NYT): 

In an interview on Megyn Kelly’s SiriusXM show last month, Mr. Hegseth acknowledged concerns about his drinking had put his nomination at risk. He promised then that there “won’t be a drop of alcohol on my lips” if he is confirmed.

I don't have any reason to doubt any of it. Although the ultimate disqualification is his lack of experience and resume to run the Pentagon. Given that he apparently hasn't run a damn thing in his life. The questions of his demons, not mention the martial infidelity and sexual assault allegations, are just extra kindling on the fire

Where is the drug use you mentioned? 

Posted
5 minutes ago, pfife said:

You voted for him and also the pardon was objectively the correct decision.  You already lost this argument multiple times.   Are you drunk posting again like everyone

Ah it’s ok when Biden lowers the standard but just not when the other side does it. Makes total sense.

Posted
1 minute ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Ah it’s ok 

The pardon didn't lower the standards. 

too bad he didn't do it while drunk then you'd support it

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...