chasfh Posted February 6 Posted February 6 10 hours ago, smr-nj said: I just can’t wrap my head around reacting to a clicked “like” or “laugh”, etc…. Reacting to that the same as if there’s a physical posted answer. It just doesn’t pass the smell test of “this is trolling” to me. Please give some additional consideration to this. 4 Quote
pfife Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Just now, chasfh said: Please give some additional consideration to this. Thank you. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted February 6 Posted February 6 13 hours ago, pfife said: First post "back" is a troll. Who would have ever guessed (basically everyone but 1776) It’s uncool to drag people into a sidebar they’re not involved in. 1 Quote
pfife Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Just now, chasfh said: It’s uncool to drag people into a sidebar they’re not involved in. Yep. Fair enough. My sincerest apologies to 1776, but not to anyone else. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Honestly, I didn’t know whether to heart or laugh. I flipped a coin for the billion. Quote
Tigerbomb13 Posted February 6 Posted February 6 43 minutes ago, chasfh said: Please give some additional consideration to this. I agree. He chose to no longer engage in the conversation, but instead just laugh reacting to many posts. Its most definitely trolling. 2 Quote
pfife Posted February 6 Posted February 6 2 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said: I agree. He chose to no longer engage in the conversation, but instead just laugh reacting to many posts. Its most definitely trolling. Thank you. Quote
chasfh Posted February 6 Posted February 6 (edited) 54 minutes ago, chasfh said: Please give some additional consideration to this. Here is some additional information to consider regarding the use of emojis as a trolling mechanism. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cseng_senior/300/ The Impact of Emojis on User Engagement with Trolling Content in Online Platforms Author Diya Saraf Date of Award 6-18-2024 Document Type Thesis Publisher Santa Clara : Santa Clara University, 2024 Department Computer Science and Engineering First Advisor Yuhong Liu Abstract This thesis examines the impact of emojis on user engagement within online discussions, particularly focusing on the trolling behavior on social media platforms such as Reddit. The central problem addressed is understanding how different types of emojis—in emotional, informational, and popularity-based categories—affect user interactions and engagement in online communications. Through a robust methodological approach, combining quantitative data analysis and Random Forest regression modeling, this research meticulously analyzes emoji usage patterns and their correlations with engagement metrics like upvotes and comments. The results highlight that emotional and popular emojis significantly enhance engagement by facilitating emotional expression and connection among users. In contrast, excessive or inappropriate use of emojis, especially those less popular or predominantly informational, tends to reduce engagement. These findings suggest that while emojis can serve as powerful tools for enhancing communication and mitigating conflicts, their misuse can lead to decreased user interaction and potential misunderstandings. Based on these insights, the study concludes that understanding the context-specific impacts of emojis is crucial for both content creators and platform moderators to foster healthier online environments. Recommendations for future research include exploring the effects of cultural differences on emoji interpretation and expanding the predictive modeling to other platforms to generalize the findings. This work contributes to the broader discourse on digital communication strategies, offering guidelines for more effective and empathetic engagement online. Edited February 6 by chasfh Quote
chasfh Posted February 6 Posted February 6 I imagine it's being regarded much differently in the fire-breathing RWM. Quote
pfife Posted February 6 Posted February 6 More not being here, not responding and not trolling apparently. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted February 6 Posted February 6 9 minutes ago, pfife said: More not being here, not responding and not trolling apparently. Quote
Tigermojo Posted February 6 Posted February 6 It's really disgusting how quickly companies are embracing misogyny and fascism. 1 1 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 6 Posted February 6 I'm surprised my company hasn't axed DEI since it's run by right wingers. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Quick question, since the President has issued orders banning transsexual women from participating in sports why doesn't the ban go both ways. There are women who have transited as well. Is it ok for them to hang out in our restrooms or locker rooms? What about sports, that's no addressed, can they play on the men's golf team if they so desire? Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 6 Posted February 6 How is it going to be enforced? Does someone from the school or government inspect what inside your pants? Quote
TJ Rollercoaster Posted February 6 Posted February 6 18 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Quick question, since the President has issued orders banning transsexual women from participating in sports why doesn't the ban go both ways. There are women who have transited as well. Is it ok for them to hang out in our restrooms or locker rooms? What about sports, that's no addressed, can they play on the men's golf team if they so desire? At some level, I think it's a deep-rooted fear that they'll glimpse a female athlete, their lizard brain will go "she's hot!", then find out the athlete was transsexual, so they'll then think that makes them a homosexual Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 6 Posted February 6 The party of deregulation wants to regulate your genitals. Quote
RatkoVarda Posted February 6 Posted February 6 33 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: How is it going to be enforced? Does someone from the school or government inspect what inside your pants? that's just what they will do -"The only way to protect girls in sports is for us to inspect their vaginas." NCAA prez said that there are about 10 transgender athletes, which equals less than two one-hundredths of 1%. but if you stick to traditional gender roles, no one will question your identity, and you will stake by unmolested. who do you think MAGA will target? Quote
Kacie Posted February 6 Posted February 6 23 minutes ago, TJ Rollercoaster said: At some level, I think it's a deep-rooted fear that they'll glimpse a female athlete, their lizard brain will go "she's hot!", then find out the athlete was transsexual, so they'll then think that makes them a homosexual They're already on the Trans porn sites and meeting the drag queens at the motel after church on Sundays. Its all projection. The loudest trans and homophobes are in the closet. Book it. 2 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 6 Posted February 6 1 minute ago, RatkoVarda said: that's just what they will do -"The only way to protect girls in sports is for us to inspect their vaginas." NCAA prez said that there are about 10 transgender athletes, which equals less than two one-hundredths of 1%. but if you stick to traditional gender roles, no one will question your identity, and you will stake by unmolested. who do you think MAGA will target? It's like when Naziholic was convinced the boxer from Algeria was trans in a country where it is strictly forbidden. It's not about protecting girl's sports; it's about being able to attack girls you don't find feminine enough. 1 Quote
pfife Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Package inspectors will be part a maga "stimulus" package Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.