Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

 

Seriously, it wasn't going to end any other way, was it? This was just the most public way we could have imagined.

Zelenskyy may well be dead inside a year.

Putin will not stop at Poland, either. He might stop at East Germany. Might.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

Maybe somebody should ask Prime Minister (in name only) Musk the same question. T-Shirt and cap in cabinet meeting (where he should not have been)

I never want to hear a so called Republican mention Obama's tan suit ever again

The following line from Zelenskyy is Bob Uecker-Major League-level brilliant:

"Maybe something like yours, yeah? Maybe something better, I don't know?"

... and the "reporter" appeared to totally miss it.

Posted
1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

It's official. The U-S no longer has any allies after today's shameful performance with Zelensky. And I wouldn't count on Russia, Vlad will turn on a dime when he gets a chance.

We are cooked.

 

Fox has stumbled in the heat of the moment like this before. January 6 is the most obvious example. They just need a little time to formulate their talking points with their товарищи, a few days or maybe a week to field test it in the minor league RWM outlets, and by next Friday it will be as though they never had trouble getting behind the meltdown at all.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

 

Probably about a third of the country will love this.  It's why they voted for him three times.    

Plus they got their English-as-an-official-language EO conveniently timed to redirect their attention away from this, so, win win win!

Posted
3 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

The worst thing is, JD Vance knows better and completely abandons his principles. 

Does he? Vance has no principles. He is an absolute scumbag. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

We have officially abandoned  NATO and left our allies out in the cold to become Putin’s partner.  
 

This is not make America great again

This is make Russia great again 

This is not America First

This is Russia First

A dark day for America and the world.

 

Edited by Hongbit
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, chasfh said:

The following line from Zelenskyy is Bob Uecker-Major League-level brilliant:

"Maybe something like yours, yeah? Maybe something better, I don't know?"

... and the "reporter" appeared to totally miss it.

More proof Trumpers are not very intelligent. That's another reason they hate liberals, we're smarter than they are.

Posted
1 hour ago, Motown Bombers said:

She said she was going to combat inflation by targeting companies who were price gouging, building 3 million homes, providing down payment assistance, and expanding Medicaid to help the sandwich generation. She literally never said any of that bull****. That's just straight up lies. 

I never said she said that, I said the administration she was a part of is what said that.  This very board relayed that sentiment that inflation wasn't an issue early on and was very slow to come to terms with it. 

And you are right that she said the other stuff you mentioned, but again, she only had 107 days to get that message to everyone, including folks that don't regularly pay attention to the news.  And why was that again?  Could it be because of the lie Biden's handlers engaged in until that fell apart in the debate which even low news volume voters were talking about the day after the debate?

Posted
7 hours ago, oblong said:

You don't have to give these people a seat at the table, they don't even want one, but the ask is to not mock them or scream in their face.  You say "Yeah, he's a bad guy.  Welcome to the party.  Here's more information.  MTU is right.  There are people who are not engaged like we are in this.   

We go after dems for having purity constests and compliment the GOP for "coming home to vote".   This is an example of that.  You need their votes.  It might make you feel good to say I told you so and **** off.... but where does that get you electorally?  What is the goal?  To scream or to win elections?

I've blocked and snoozed a lot of liberals b/c I don't need a daily 4 page rant from Heather Cox Richardson or Occupy Democrats to tell me what I already know.

 

I disagree.  The Dems having been doing this "let's have a conversation" thing for how long?  The notion that there's all these sweet innocent country folk who just didn't know better is bull****.  Even poor "Ryleigh" or whatever from Baldwin.  She basically wanted free **** for herself but didn't want those black or brown people to have it.  Chances are she married a MAGAt and that's what changed her vote from 2020.  She was also sexually assaulted as a teen and still voted for a sexual assaulter. But sure, let's present facts to these dolts. I mean, why don't we sit down and have a nice chat with those who were gassing and burning other humans?  I mean, some compassion is in order.  

If y'all wanna buy the bull**** about it being about inflation or the lab leak or Biden's age, have at it.  I'm sticking with the mocking, shaming and watching the face eating the traitors who knew exactly what they were voting for.  When there's nothing left but bones and the leopard burping, they may start to reconsider their vote.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

I never said she said that, I said the administration she was a part of is what said that.  This very board relayed that sentiment that inflation wasn't an issue early on and was very slow to come to terms with it. 

And you are right that she said the other stuff you mentioned, but again, she only had 107 days to get that message to everyone, including folks that don't regularly pay attention to the news.  And why was that again?  Could it be because of the lie Biden's handlers engaged in until that fell apart in the debate which even low news volume voters were talking about the day after the debate?

The horse has been flogged to death, but I really do think she played an incredibly ****ty hand about as well as she could have. Argued with Holic and 1776 at length about that - but just pointing to the loss and calling it a failure ignores how terrible of shape Biden's candidacy was in when he dropped out. 

Had he stayed in? He would have lost states like New Mexico and New Jersey.... a state like Illinois would have been a 50/50 proposition.

Biden wasn't as bad a President as his detractors felt.... legislative, he got a lot of **** done with no margins in Congress. I'd certainly take him right now over what we currently have (probably would take him hooked up to an iron lung even lol). But his decision not to get out until July 2024 was a historic mistake. Pretty sure I said it at the time, but he really needed to pull the plug around Sept.-Oct 2023. Harris would have still likely been the nominee, not even sure it would have been a real primary (just think that Dem base voters would have naturally went to her, tbh), but it would have given her more of a chance to establish distance and be her own candidate.

Posted

Do you think you're going to have free and fair elections in two years? He's clearly Putin's stooge and he's putting all of his lackeys in power. Two years from now we'll all be living the handmaid's tale.

Posted
57 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

I never said she said that, I said the administration she was a part of is what said that.  This very board relayed that sentiment that inflation wasn't an issue early on and was very slow to come to terms with it. 

And you are right that she said the other stuff you mentioned, but again, she only had 107 days to get that message to everyone, including folks that don't regularly pay attention to the news.  And why was that again?  Could it be because of the lie Biden's handlers engaged in until that fell apart in the debate which even low news volume voters were talking about the day after the debate?

The Biden administration never said it either, and his handlers didn't lie. 

Posted
1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

More proof Trumpers are not very intelligent. That's another reason they hate liberals, we're smarter than they are.

Musk didn't wear a suit in the same office. And his toddler, who shouldn't have been there, wiped a booger on Trump's desk. But they won't call that disrespectful?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...