chasfh Posted January 10 Posted January 10 9 hours ago, Tiger337 said: She seems super conservative, but reasonably honest. Trump misjudged the honest part. Yes, and yesterday’s ruling was the true conservative position. Quote
chasfh Posted January 10 Posted January 10 4 hours ago, Deleterious said: For sale. Toyota, Boeing, Chevron, and Google have also contributed. Locally, GM and Ford have both donated. The new standard for what constitutes proper ethical behavior. Quote
Tigermojo Posted January 10 Posted January 10 America is the woman who says she wants to find a good guy and marries a felon. Nobody wants freedom or fairness, we want excitement and drama. The rich have all the advantages, all the lawyers, experts and algorithms to make the most profit and pay the least wages. We have no one who will stand up to them. There used to be politicians who believed in fairness but now they just want to cash in. 2 1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 10 Posted January 10 (edited) Just for grins. This strip is from 2016. Who needs guys like RFKjr and Musk when you have Rat. Edited January 10 by CMRivdogs Quote
gehringer_2 Posted January 10 Posted January 10 17 hours ago, Tiger337 said: She seems super conservative, but reasonably honest. Trump misjudged the honest part. If you've ever watched the dynamics between men vs between women in the workplace, they are different, and I don't imagine that even in the rarefied air of SCOTUS, in the end, things are so different than the rest of the world in that regard. I will venture the supposition that over time the three women on the court will have more influence on each other, despite any initial ideological differences, than the male members of the court generally have on each other. 1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 10 Posted January 10 Quote 🚨FUN FACT: Donald Trump's felony conviction would most likely keep him from enlisting in the military, which has high standards. Troops now have to serve under someone who lied his way out of military service and now couldn't even join if he wanted to! What an embarrassment! https://bsky.app/profile/votevets.bsky.social/post/3lfflxpzvlk2b 1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 10 Posted January 10 (edited) So what does this do for reducing the price of eggs? https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/laken-riley-act-ice-detentions-beds?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiossneakpeek&stream=top Quote Federal immigration officials are warning Congress that the Laken Riley Act could require detention for 60,000 people — needing billions of dollars and thousands more detention beds to comply, Axios has learned. Why it matters: The bill requiring detention for undocumented immigrants accused of certain nonviolent crimes has received stunning bipartisan support in Congress this year. Driving the news: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent details to congressional offices in December on what they would need to enforce the Laken Riley Act if it became law, according to a copy of the report obtained by Axios. ICE warned that without emergency funding, they could be forced to release tens of thousands of immigrants — including potentially some deemed to be public safety threats. We're talking $3.2 Billion. That better not come out of my Social Security or Medicare https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/10/spending-cuts-house-gop-reconciliation-medicaid-00197541 Edited January 10 by CMRivdogs Quote
gehringer_2 Posted January 10 Posted January 10 (edited) 25 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: So what does this do for reducing the price of eggs? https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/laken-riley-act-ice-detentions-beds?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiossneakpeek&stream=top We're talking $3.2 Billion. That better not come out of my Social Security or Medicare https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/10/spending-cuts-house-gop-reconciliation-medicaid-00197541 why does anyone think the asylum system got backed-up by the millions? - Because no-one would pay the bill to expand the ability to process people. Lack of funding has been at the heart of immigration chaos since Reagan. Passing more laws will pretty much make no difference if funding doesn't materialize for them to executed. Edited January 10 by gehringer_2 1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 10 Posted January 10 Once again the Republican Way.....Promise them anything, but give them chicken**** and complain about the Democrats deficit Quote
gehringer_2 Posted January 10 Posted January 10 6 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: He's only half right. There is nothing wrong with spending the money if you are willing to raise it. The real problem is that most of the GOP wants to spend money just as much as the dems, they just don't want to take the responsibility for raising any. 1 Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 10 Author Posted January 10 19 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: This is from December during the Omni bill… Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 10 Author Posted January 10 56 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: So what does this do for reducing the price of eggs? https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/laken-riley-act-ice-detentions-beds?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiossneakpeek&stream=top We're talking $3.2 Billion. That better not come out of my Social Security or Medicare https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/10/spending-cuts-house-gop-reconciliation-medicaid-00197541 We already spend Billions on illegals. I have lost track how many billions Biden has dished out in the last two months alone. Drop in the bucket, plus once they are deported we will have a net gain. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 10 Posted January 10 18 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said: This is from December during the Omni bill… But your team still owned the House Quote
pfife Posted January 11 Posted January 11 2 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: He's only half right. There is nothing wrong with spending the money if you are willing to raise it. The real problem is that most of the GOP wants to spend money just as much as the dems, they just don't want to take the responsibility for raising any. easier to gaslight with some "tax cuts increase revenues" nonsense Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 3 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: But your team still owned the House Did you see the cost of the bill passed compared to the original? I know you did but hey. Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted January 11 Posted January 11 All these CEOs so blatantly kissing up to him. Bezos with a $40 million bribe (yeah, right, a 40 million documentary, sure). Makes me think some thing really really bad is going to happen. Wouldn't shock me if he goes full Dictator mode and starts having Democratic politicians and Governors arrested. The goal is to get 2/3 of the states in Republican control so they can radically change the constitution. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 13 Posted January 13 19 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said: Trump coming. 100th verse, same as the first..... Quote
pfife Posted January 14 Posted January 14 (edited) Lol already taking credit for Bidens work. I thought you were you to stop with the misinfo after you pretended you had the choice to own your other posting of misinfo. Edited January 14 by pfife Quote
pfife Posted January 14 Posted January 14 (edited) Im sure this is no big deal. After all hashtag only the best https://www.axios.com/2025/01/14/trump-hegseth-confirmation-fbi-background-check Scoop: Trump team sets red line on Hegseth's FBI background check Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing is becoming a test of will for Republicans on ensuring FBI files aren't distributed throughout the entire Senate. Why it matters: The Trump transition team is demanding that the president-elect's nominees be treated the same way they insist Joe Biden's were. That means no FBI background check access for rank-and-file senators, according to two people familiar with the matter. Edited January 14 by pfife Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.