Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

https://newrepublic.com/article/166358/disastrous-legacy-new-democrats

You can thank Bubba Clinton for killing the New Deal era policies of FDR and LBJ and ridding the party of New Deal era Democrats as much as Reagan. It was Bubba and his acolytes that started the New Democrats and the Democratic Leadership Council in Washington DC. It was Bubba that gutted welfare with the switch from AFDC to TANF. It was Bubba that doubled the extreme rate of poverty in this country. It was Bubba that enacted NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, and PNTR status with China. It was Bubba who deregulated media (TV and radio) with the Telecommunications Act of 1995. It was Bubba would replead Glass-Steagall and replaced it with Gramm-Leach-Bliley. It was Bubba who deregulated the commodities and derivatives trading. It was Bubba who killed local banking with the Riegel-Neal Interstate Banking Act.

The Gipper definitely started an era of massive deregulation, tax cuts for the wealthy elite, globalism, union busting, and an erosion of social welfare in this country. Reagan deserves a hefty amount of criticism for all the devastation his policies caused, in particular on economic issues. Reagan hurt many, many millions and millions of people with his economic and social agendas. That said, I feel Clinton deserves in on the share of criticism for the mess we are in now economically. Instead of building off the New Deal and Great Society he reversed that trend and continued down the path Reagan started us on.

No, you can thank white people. Democrats haven't won the majority of the white vote since Johnson. Clinton came in after Republicans had been in charge 18 of the 22 years since Johnson. I think it's still adorable you prattle on about NAFTA. We literally just ushered in a tyrant over egg prices. The people want cheap stuff. LMAO building off the Great Society. Dems were literally crushed for that for 20 years and still are. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

No, you can thank white people. Democrats haven't won the majority of the white vote since Johnson. Clinton came in after Republicans had been in charge 18 of the 22 years since Johnson. I think it's still adorable you prattle on about NAFTA. We literally just ushered in a tyrant over egg prices. The people want cheap stuff. LMAO building off the Great Society. Dems were literally crushed for that for 20 years and still are. 

yeah - that's the short form version! 🎱

Posted
45 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said:

We are ****ed if this nutcase gets through. 

They put a nutcase sociopathic dilettante who thinks we deserve it if we get Cancer on the same day as Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard because they thought Kash and Tulsi were so strong?  

Posted

Imagine if you will that the man who said "**** it pardon them all" not having the stomach to fight legal battles in the weeds over every sweeping order he issues from his magic desk. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said:

Looks like the arsonists are going to give themselves another participation trophy

image.png.4e8ab6d15e35175a203a92a2e7372216.png

So we're not defunding local police departments, fire departments, Headstart preschool for kids, and Meals on Wheels programs for seniors now?

Posted
40 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said:

Looks like the arsonists are going to give themselves another participation trophy

image.png.4e8ab6d15e35175a203a92a2e7372216.png

Boom the boss is in,  the script writes itself, the left wanted it to be true so bad

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, ben9753 said:

Weak. Giving into the woke libs. What a cuck

The thing with Trump is that at his core, he craves approval. He basks in MAGA approval but anytime he does something that evokes a big enough backlash in the general population (beyond what he can chalk up to just the woke libs) he backs off.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
1 minute ago, gehringer_2 said:

The thing with Trump is that at his core, he craves approval. He basks in MAGA approval but anytime he does something that evokes a big enough backlash in the general population (beyond what he can chalk up to just the woke libs) he backs off.

One can imagine some David Hyde Pierce character standing in front of him having to explain why these things are not being received better by "his people". 

  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

These people I have the least sympathy for. 

 

This will end up in court of course. The exec has broad powers over immigration policy but selective enforcement based on exercise of free speech under the 1st amendment still might not pass even this SCOTUS.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...