2025 Lions offseason

[Mr.TaterSalad]

I know it won't happen, but on Valenti's show today they are talking about Trey Hendrickson. Valenti went as far as saying if he had to, he'd let a Branch, Joseph, or LaPorta walk when their rookie deals are up if it meant having Hendrickson now. He said he would trade for Hendrickson and offer him 3 years @ $105 million with $80 million guaranteed.

If it were up to you, would you make a trade to get Hendrickson that involved multiple high picks and then sign him to the above 3 year deal? Would you be ok with getting Hendrickson if it meant you lost one of your high profile starters like Branch, Joseph, or LaPorta?

[Dan Gilmore]

No. Another example of your latch onto an idea and never let go. And why listen to that crap?

[Mr.TaterSalad]

22 minutes ago, Dan Gilmore said:

No. Another example of your latch onto an idea and never let go. And why listen to that crap?

Do you feel this team would be more successful without Hendrickson on it then? If the goal is to win a Super Bowl, doesn't Hendrickson on this team in the immediate here and now for next season help get us closer to achieving that goal?

Howie Roseman and the Eagles went out and made two big moves when they signed Saquon Barkley and Bryce Huff and that certainly worked out in their favor and helped get them to a Super Bowl. The year before the 49'ers made a big move and added Javon Hargrave, who was a big part of their defense that got them to a Super Bowl. 

[Sports_Freak]

52 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

I know it won't happen, but on Valenti's show today they are talking about Trey Hendrickson. Valenti went as far as saying if he had to, he'd let a Branch, Joseph, or LaPorta walk when their rookie deals are up if it meant having Hendrickson now. He said he would trade for Hendrickson and offer him 3 years @ $105 million with $80 million guaranteed.

If it were up to you, would you make a trade to get Hendrickson that involved multiple high picks and then sign him to the above 3 year deal? Would you be ok with getting Hendrickson if it meant you lost one of your high profile starters like Branch, Joseph, or LaPorta?

I would be all for trading draft picks. Even if Brad were to find the next superstar in the draft, could we sign him as well as Hutch, Branch and Kirby? As for taking on Hendrikson and giving him a huge contract? IDK..I mean, I don't see Brad doing that anyway so there's no point in thinking about it. Just...not happening.

[Sports_Freak]

People bought jerseys.

 

[Sports_Freak]

That last post didn't copy properly. Here it is corrected;

[Jason_R]

If Hutch stayed healthy last year the Lions would have won the Super Bowl. No need for a major move. 

Edited 14 hours ago by Jason_R

[buddha]

19 hours ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

Do you feel this team would be more successful without Hendrickson on it then? If the goal is to win a Super Bowl, doesn't Hendrickson on this team in the immediate here and now for next season help get us closer to achieving that goal?

Howie Roseman and the Eagles went out and made two big moves when they signed Saquon Barkley and Bryce Huff and that certainly worked out in their favor and helped get them to a Super Bowl. The year before the 49'ers made a big move and added Javon Hargrave, who was a big part of their defense that got them to a Super Bowl. 

you cant sign henderickson and keep their depth.  i'd rather keep the depth and draft someone.