Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

I've driven one EV to  date, which was a BMW I spent a day with in LA, but I didn't spend a lot of time with it to learn all the bells and whistles so I didn't know how to kill the regen braking on the fly like that, but it's certainly a feature I would want. With that Beemer it was quite irritating that if you killed the cruise control, instead of going into a coast, you were immediately slowing down fairly hard - not at all what you  normally wanted on the 405 in that situation! So you had to be ready to hunt for the neutral throttle position when disengaging the cruise. I'm sure there was a better way but I just didn't know it - or at least hope there was!

I have one acquaintance with a Tesla but he is so non-tech I don't know if I'd get much out of him to ask him about it. Worth a try next time I see him though. ...:classic_biggrin:

Yeah, most EV's have different modes.  Highest is basically one pedal driving with no brakes and they lowest is more like a normal ICE car.  

Posted
11 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

we might make a ST trip but probably drive!

Maybe the flight industry experiences a dramatic drop off in passenger load, dropping prices in a competitive airline market, leading airlines to work with Trump to re-regulate ticket prices in order to protect their profits.

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Maybe the flight industry experiences a dramatic drop off in passenger load, dropping prices in a competitive airline market, leading airlines to work with Trump to re-regulate ticket prices in order to protect their profits.

And the so called 'low cost' airline model is collapsing anyway since the majors are now 'classing' their service and seating in each airplane and unbundling charges in a way that cuts the low cost fliers out of their market. The merger scramble among the discount fliers being exhibit "A".

What I wonder is how much a ticket would actually cost today of the airlines were still operating under the old CAB regime and flying was actually an enjoyable experience. I'm sure the deregulation types would say it would be so expensive no-one could fly - but I still wonder. If you do the right thing by everyone, there is economy of scale to that too!

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
23 hours ago, ewsieg said:

I used to perform audits a long time ago.  It would have been so much simpler if anytime I had an invoice in front of me the question was "Did paying this result in some of the money making it into my pocket?" and 'No' meant I told my company not to pay it anymore and 'Yes' meant I told my company it was worthwhile to keep.

Exactly the same philosophy as Musk!

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

Baseball is important!

The cowards in sports journalism need to move along to the microblogging app that won't steal your democracy.

Edited by romad1
Posted (edited)

I doubt it's as high as 12 million people, but this is something I have seen in my work too.  I wouldn't assume it's fraud. It could be in some cases, but it is more likely to be erroneous birthdates due to two-digit years.  What I mean is if someone has a two-digit birthyear "00", they were probably born in 2000, but might be assumed to have been born in 1900 due to an old algorithm.  0000 or 9999 could also indicate a missing value.   

https://www.ntd.com/database-lists-12-million-people-older-than-120-eligible-for-social-security-musk_1048177.html

Edited by Tiger337
Posted
46 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I doubt it's as high as 12 million people, but this is something I have seen in my work too.  I wouldn't assume it's fraud. It could be in some cases, but it is more likely to be erroneous birthdates due to two-digit years.  What I mean is if someone has a two-digit birthyear "00", they were probably born in 2000, but might be assumed to have been born in 1900 due to an old algorithm.  0000 or 9999 could also indicate a missing value.   

https://www.ntd.com/database-lists-12-million-people-older-than-120-eligible-for-social-security-musk_1048177.html

Yep, no fraud. Move along.

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Yep, no fraud. Move along.

Oh it definitely could be fraud.  It could have been hacked by the Nigerians or Chinese.  It could be Trump's or Musk's buddies or maybe Biden, Obama and Pelosi snuck in there in the middle of the night and added a bunch of illegal immigrants.  Or maybe Musk is making it up as way to illegally transfer money.  There are lots possibilities, but maybe the guy currently in charge of all the money in the country might want to investigate further before giddily telling the world what he found like a three year old.  

I was mostly just sharing my experience working with this kind of data

 

Edited by Tiger337
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

I doubt it's as high as 12 million people, but this is something I have seen in my work too.  I wouldn't assume it's fraud. It could be in some cases, but it is more likely to be erroneous birthdates due to two-digit years.  What I mean is if someone has a two-digit birthyear "00", they were probably born in 2000, but might be assumed to have been born in 1900 due to an old algorithm.  0000 or 9999 could also indicate a missing value.   

https://www.ntd.com/database-lists-12-million-people-older-than-120-eligible-for-social-security-musk_1048177.html

I think theres been admission that the record were not for people who were receiving checks.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiger337 said:

Oh it definitely could be fraud.  It could have been hacked by the Nigerians or Chinese.  It could be Trump's or Musk's buddies or maybe Biden, Obama and Pelosi snuck in there in the middle of the night and added a bunch of illegal immigrants.  Or maybe Musk is making it up as way to illegally transfer money.  There are lots possibilities, but maybe the guy currently in charge of all the money in the country might want to investigate further before giddily telling the world what he found like a three year old.  

I was mostly just sharing my experience working with this kind of data

 

only doge is smart enough to apply a business rule to a dataset 

Posted (edited)

Honest question, if you're a federal worker who was fired and then had to be recontacted for rehire... How could you ever trust them going forward?

Edited by mtutiger

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...