Arlington Posted April 20 Posted April 20 Doesn't the system know by the time the ball hits the catchers glove whether it was a strike or ball? Given that, I don't see it slowing the game down at all. I wish they would just go with it full time, and I believe they eventually will take that call out of the umpire's discretion. There is too much grumbling about ball and strike calls. It seems to be a factor in every game to some degree. Bad calls do add to the entertainment value of the game. KC's coach was thrown out of Friday's game for grumbling. But I think they should be done with the drama and have am accurate and decisive system. You know, when you think about it, once that happens the principle duty of the home ump will be a ball dispenser. Quote
papalawrence Posted April 20 Posted April 20 What a great baseball day! Tigers win, and both the Dodgers and Yankees blow leads in the 9th and lose on walk-off home runs. Is this Christmas!? Quote
CMRivdogs Posted Monday at 02:18 PM Posted Monday at 02:18 PM A couple weird "calls" in yesterday's NYY/Tampa game. 1) Ground ball bobble by Paul Goldsmidt ruled an error originally ruled an error, was changed to a hit between innings (probably the correct ruling) ending Max Fried's no hit bid... https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6294733/2025/04/20/max-fried-no-hitter-ended-error/?source=athletic_thewindup_newsletter&campaign=13272973&userId=213687 2) Arron Judge's apparent home run called foul because of the short foul poles in Steinbrenner Field. Quote
oblong Posted Monday at 02:22 PM Posted Monday at 02:22 PM well the Yankees org owns the field so they should make them bigger. I saw the HR.... seemed very obvious it was fair but I'll concede that I only saw one angle and it could be deceiving but I don't see how. Quote
papalawrence Posted Monday at 03:20 PM Posted Monday at 03:20 PM I will always hate the Yankees. And the Red Sox. And now the Dodgers. Quote
chasfh Posted Tuesday at 06:15 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:15 PM Man, i wish the Atletic would ask this of baseball players, because I sure would liek to know how they feel about gambling aprtnerships. I would bet that because of baseball's history, the "No" side would be more in the 50s than the 40s, although I don't know, maybe I'm off base on this. There's an entire article on The Athletic ($) about this: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6298159/2025/04/22/nba-player-poll-gambling-partnerships/ Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted Tuesday at 06:49 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:49 PM I occasionally throw bets in on College Football and UFC with my buddies just for fun…. …. But I’m not touching baseball or basketball and I don’t know why anyone would. Quote
chasfh Posted Tuesday at 07:04 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:04 PM I believe it’s one thing to have informal bets with your buddies, or even visit a sportsook to lay a bet, but it’s completely different for leagues to partner with gambling companies to try to get as many people betting as much money on games as they possibly can. 1 Quote
oblong Posted Tuesday at 07:21 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:21 PM I don't know where the line is.... but I'm definitely uncomfortable with the encouragement of it... especailly with the in studio "bet of the day" or whatever they call it. Frankly I think the country's economy would be far better off if all forms of gambling, outside of Casinos in Vegas, Atlantic City, and real Indian reservations were gone. That includes lotteries, stratch offs, etc. I frequent my gas station a lot b/c I work from home and I enjoy going up to get a tea or coffee or banana. It's a nice 10 minute walk. The $$ I see spent on lotteries is insane. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 12:30 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:30 PM 17 hours ago, oblong said: I don't know where the line is.... but I'm definitely uncomfortable with the encouragement of it... especailly with the in studio "bet of the day" or whatever they call it. Frankly I think the country's economy would be far better off if all forms of gambling, outside of Casinos in Vegas, Atlantic City, and real Indian reservations were gone. That includes lotteries, stratch offs, etc. I frequent my gas station a lot b/c I work from home and I enjoy going up to get a tea or coffee or banana. It's a nice 10 minute walk. The $$ I see spent on lotteries is insane. Totally agree and that’s what I left unsaid in my post—it’s the ability to gamble as easily as simply unlocking your phone. I assume betting apps have lockscreen alerts people can do one-touch bet rights from. People might reply, well, you can’t stop people from betting if they want to. And that’s true, you can’t, if they really want to. It’s the enticing people who never thought about betting in the first place that I think is terrible. People with genetically addictive personalities getting sucked into it and then never getting out of it. I think if people really want to bet, they should have to seek it out and then have to put some work into placing the bet. If it were a lot harder to do, I … ahem … bet that at least 80% of all people who have gambling problems today would have never even started doing it, or even thought about it. Quote
Sports_Freak Posted Wednesday at 04:34 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:34 PM One of these bottom feeders had to win. May as well make it kinda exciting; Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted Wednesday at 05:13 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:13 PM 22 hours ago, chasfh said: I believe it’s one thing to have informal bets with your buddies, or even visit a sportsook to lay a bet, but it’s completely different for leagues to partner with gambling companies to try to get as many people betting as much money on games as they possibly can. Yep. You don’t see ads for Tobacco, why is it ok for gambling? Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted Wednesday at 05:15 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:15 PM 21 hours ago, oblong said: I don't know where the line is.... but I'm definitely uncomfortable with the encouragement of it... especailly with the in studio "bet of the day" or whatever they call it. Frankly I think the country's economy would be far better off if all forms of gambling, outside of Casinos in Vegas, Atlantic City, and real Indian reservations were gone. That includes lotteries, stratch offs, etc. I frequent my gas station a lot b/c I work from home and I enjoy going up to get a tea or coffee or banana. It's a nice 10 minute walk. The $$ I see spent on lotteries is insane. Well isn’t a significant portion of the lotto money “supposed” to help fund education? 1 Quote
oblong Posted Wednesday at 05:17 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:17 PM riiiiiiight. Thats the problem with using vice taxes for things other than addressing the vice. What would happen to our municipal budgets if everybody woke up tomorrow and decided "I'm not smoking anymore". Quote
oblong Posted Wednesday at 05:18 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:18 PM 4 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said: Yep. You don’t see ads for Tobacco, why is it ok for gambling? better lobbyists. 1 Quote
Tigermojo Posted Wednesday at 08:07 PM Posted Wednesday at 08:07 PM Workman designated for assignment by the Cubs. If no other team claims him as a rule V, he will go back to Detroit for $50K. Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 09:35 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:35 PM 1 hour ago, Tigermojo said: Workman designated for assignment by the Cubs. If no other team claims him as a rule V, he will go back to Detroit for $50K. We don’t have to take him, do we? 😏 Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 11:08 PM Posted Wednesday at 11:08 PM Old friend of our starting for the Cubs tonight. Quote
IdahoBert Posted Thursday at 01:48 PM Posted Thursday at 01:48 PM Right now on April 24 in interleague play the American League is losing to the NL by 54–67. The Twins and the Athletics are largely the cause of this by going 7–17. And who hasn’t played a single game against the NL yet? The White Sox, so the disparity is certain to get worse. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted Thursday at 02:01 PM Posted Thursday at 02:01 PM 11 minutes ago, IdahoBert said: Right now on April 24 in interleague play the American League is losing to the NL by 54–67. The Twins and the Athletics are largely the cause of this by going 7–17. And who hasn’t played a single game against the NL yet? The White Sox, so the disparity is certain to get worse. I did a presentation a few years ago maintaining that the American Leaguer was a tougher, stronger, better league than the national league, full stop. That was before universal DH, which I think had a greater effect on the disparity than people at the time were willing to admit. 1 Quote
IdahoBert Posted Thursday at 02:06 PM Posted Thursday at 02:06 PM Imagine how big the disparity will get by the end of the season when the Chicago White Sox have played 48 games against the NL…. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted Thursday at 02:13 PM Posted Thursday at 02:13 PM 15 hours ago, chasfh said: Old friend of our starting for the Cubs tonight. So, Old Friend of Ours had a rough go: six innings, ten hits plus a walk, only four strikeouts, and six runs yielded. And he still got credit for a Quality Start. Why? Because only three of the six runs he gave up were earned, because he himself made an error to extend the inning and all three subsequent runs, including a bomb he gave up, went into the books as unearned. Baseball! 1 Quote
IdahoBert Posted Thursday at 02:17 PM Posted Thursday at 02:17 PM I know a clique of people who are Ivy League graduates and their fantasy baseball league was only National League because there was no DH and it was “real baseball with real strategy” and they were real snobs about it but now they admit they don’t give a damn about the absence of pitchers batting. Quote
IdahoBert Posted Thursday at 02:19 PM Posted Thursday at 02:19 PM 5 minutes ago, chasfh said: So, Old Friend of Ours had a rough go: six innings, ten hits plus a walk, only four strikeouts, and six runs yielded. And he still got credit for a Quality Start. Why? Because only three of the six runs he gave up were earned, because he himself made an error to extend the inning and all three subsequent runs, including a bomb he gave up, went into the books as unearned. Baseball! Yeah, I looked up the box score because by your picture I couldn’t tell who was pitching for the Cubs and saw his line and had to chuckle. Quote
chasfh Posted Thursday at 02:27 PM Posted Thursday at 02:27 PM 7 minutes ago, IdahoBert said: Yeah, I looked up the box score because by your picture I couldn’t tell who was pitching for the Cubs and saw his line and had to chuckle. Yeah. photos don't render particularly well when you upload them to most websites, this one not excepted. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.