Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was away from home in Winnipeg for a little over a week so I've missed the post Four Nations games, but I did catch some of the outdoor game on the plane home when the feed worked for me.  I missed most of the third unfortunately.  I thought Larkin looked really off all game it was weird, maybe the ice was affecting him/his speed but I felt pretty frustrated with what I saw of his play.  Maybe I was just overtired and mixed with a few airport margaritas though.

Posted
46 minutes ago, slothfacekilla said:

I was away from home in Winnipeg for a little over a week so I've missed the post Four Nations games, but I did catch some of the outdoor game on the plane home when the feed worked for me.  I missed most of the third unfortunately.  I thought Larkin looked really off all game it was weird, maybe the ice was affecting him/his speed but I felt pretty frustrated with what I saw of his play.  Maybe I was just overtired and mixed with a few airport margaritas though.

McLellan did call out Larkin for his play in the first Columbus game. Not sure whether he said anything yesterday. 

Posted (edited)

So what does the playoff situation look like as of today March 3, with 22 games to go?

image.thumb.png.6ce0a97d05e6def1dde5b42583389437.png

- No surprise that Toronto (12 pts up on Wings), Florida and Tampa (8 pts up on the Wings) have all distanced themselves from the Wings. The Wings aren't going to snag a top 3 spot in the Atlantic, they're competing for one of two wild card spots. Fine, negligible difference between playing 1st place Atlantic or 2nd place Atlantic, since any of the top 3 could end up in any of the top 3 spots

- Keep expecting Columbus to fall off and the Wings could have delivered them a near-fatal blow the past week, but after winning 4 of 4 points from the Wings it is instead Columbus that holds the #1 wildcard spot

- The Wings still hold the #2 wildcard spot but the Senators would pull into a tie and have more Regulation Wins if they win the game in hand they have on the Wings

- The Rangers and Bruins are also lurking 2 points back of the Wings. The Rangers probably have the best roster of teams battling the Wings, but the loss of Adam Fox for awhile might hurt. Still a chance for NJ to fall down enough into a bubble spot, so can hope for that if the Rangers begin a surge into 3rd place in their division.

- Montreal, Philadelphia and NYI are close enough still to be counted, at 3-5 points behind Detroit, but if the Wings end up having to worry about any of those teams they're in trouble and probably will have been passed by a couple of others before that

- Pittsburgh at 8 points back and having 3 more games than the Wings is a non-factor. We can hope for Penguins' wins when they play bubble teams. Needless to say Buffalo is out too.

In tonight's games:

- Ottawa at Washington. Go Caps.

- Buffalo at Montreal. Go Sabres.

- NYI at NYR. Go Islanders.

Edited by lordstanley
Posted

They need to focus on getting back to playing good 5v5 hockey.   The playoffs will happen if they can do that.    They have been far too reliant on PP and can’t let games come down to if they get calls or not. 

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

They need to focus on getting back to playing good 5v5 hockey.   The playoffs will happen if they can do that.    They have been far too reliant on PP and can’t let games come down to if they get calls or not. 

they get in the habit of just continually falling back on D instead of pressuring the puck. You can watch 5 minutes of Wings game and see exactly how it's going to go by whether they are pressuring the puck aggressively on defense.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted

More commitment to forechecking will go a long way to improving their 5v5.  They have seen first hand how teams can become tough to play when you’re fighting just to get the puck past the red line.    

 

Posted

the red wings have had problems with big, physical teams for a long time.  yzerman has tried to bring in tougher players like chairot, seider, petry, and even edvinsson.  i'm pretty sure that's why they wanted trouba and had no issue getting rid of walman.

there's a lot of soft - or non-physical - players on the team, especially up front.  berggren, kane, debrincat, raymond.  

the guys who SHOULD be physical presences are rasmussen and soderblom but theyre really not those types of players.

this seemingly happens every year.  once the games start to matter the red wings get punked because other than larkin (who has a ton of pride but isnt big), chairot and now seider, no one else on the team plays with a real physical edge.  

its was rasmussen bugs me so much.  youre that big.  act like it.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, buddha said:

the red wings have had problems with big, physical teams for a long time.  yzerman has tried to bring in tougher players like chairot, seider, petry, and even edvinsson.  i'm pretty sure that's why they wanted trouba and had no issue getting rid of walman.

there's a lot of soft - or non-physical - players on the team, especially up front.  berggren, kane, debrincat, raymond.  

the guys who SHOULD be physical presences are rasmussen and soderblom but theyre really not those types of players.

this seemingly happens every year.  once the games start to matter the red wings get punked because other than larkin (who has a ton of pride but isnt big), chairot and now seider, no one else on the team plays with a real physical edge.  

its was rasmussen bugs me so much.  youre that big.  act like it.

in at least one game recently Soderblom did lead the team in hits. That may not be saying a lot for this team.

The thing is, even the other team is taking you out of your offense with their physicality, that's no excuse for not pressuring the puck better when they are on O. You aren't going to get checked by the puck carrier.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
2 hours ago, buddha said:

...  once the games start to matter the red wings get punked because other than ... no one else on the team plays with a real physical edge...

I just said this to my dad yesterday as we were talking about the Wings...

This team is missing the playoff-level toughness required to make it.

I told him we need at least 3 or 4 guys on the team that play at that level. He suggested the Grind Line. I suggested Brendan Shanahan. 

We need both. It's not just that Debrincat has toughness (but with Cicarelli-size) or that we should forecheck more (ala Hongbit)... But the players have to be at the current level of size/ toughness/ physicality/ skill of whatever the current iteration of those guys are... PLUS also a couple playoff-level defenders (with size, toughness AND skill) like Trouba or similar...

And as you say: Rasmussen has the size but can't/ won't/ doesn't use it. He's missing that highest level of toughness (playoff-level) needed...

Posted
36 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

And as you say: Rasmussen has the size but can't/ won't/ doesn't use it.

just because you are big doesn't necessarily mean you have the strength that matches your size. I suppose if we could watch one of  his workouts it would tell, but watching him I've just never gotten  any impression of power in that body. He's not all that strong on his skates - though better than a couple of years ago, he's not particularly strong against other players at the boards even aside from willingness to hit. You don't even have to clobber guys all over the ice to win the physical battle of a hockey game if you can out power or even out work guys in the one on ones.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Shinzaki said:

Tonight's game has a must win feel to it

Yeah, fans and players remember that this time last season is when the Wings lost 7 straight, all in regulation, to not only lose their cushion but fall out of a playoff spot. It has only been 2 games so far, but nip in bud.

Edited by lordstanley
Posted
7 hours ago, lordstanley said:

Yeah, fans and players remember that this time last season is when the Wings lost 7 straight, all in regulation, to not only lose their cushion but fall out of a playoff spot. It has only been 2 games so far, but nip in bud.

We have 2 games to prevent Yzerman making us sellers at the deadline?

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

We have 2 games to prevent Yzerman making us sellers at the deadline?

They won’t be sellers. The only reason they won’t buy is if the market is skewed to prices too high. But even sellers’ market won’t have them sell, nor would a blowout loss before that 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      290
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    alkalinebatteries
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...