Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

There's the famous story about Hornsby when he was a manager and a young player asked him to teach him how to hit. Instead of giving instructions, Hornsby grabbed a bat and started hitting line drive after line drive.  After he was done, he said: "That's how you hit".

The story may not be true, but he had a reputation of being a terrible manager.  

 

I spent a lot of time with my kids teaching them how to hit at young ages and I run hitting clinics for my girls now and I'm astounded at the difference between girls who are in Travel and are hitting all the time and my kids who only lightly did travel and the amount of contact my kids make vs these supposed selected players.   My kids were never power hitters (indeed my daughter has noodle arms) but she can put a ball in play on any pitch that is within 5-6" of the strike zone.  

Was that taught or was it just reps?  

Posted
10 minutes ago, romad1 said:

I spent a lot of time with my kids teaching them how to hit at young ages and I run hitting clinics for my girls now and I'm astounded at the difference between girls who are in Travel and are hitting all the time and my kids who only lightly did travel and the amount of contact my kids make vs these supposed selected players.   My kids were never power hitters (indeed my daughter has noodle arms) but she can put a ball in play on any pitch that is within 5-6" of the strike zone.  

Was that taught or was it just reps?  

I think, at a young age, a lot of improvement can come from reps.  At higher levels versus better competition, instruction in the finer points of hitting becomes more necessary.   

Posted
12 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I think, at a young age, a lot of improvement can come from reps.  At higher levels versus better competition, instruction in the finer points of hitting becomes more necessary.   

Yeah true.  

Posted

I do believe that those guys would struggle more in today's world where the pitchers are also doing analysis at a higher level.  Attitudes on pitching approach evolved so Mantle and Hornsby would be facing guys who are adjusting.  Williams would eat this **** up.

Of course I think the strategy for hitters has been the same but we have more ways of identifying and quantifying it so when guys say "they don't do that", they are, they just don't know it.  Like Joe Morgan being against analytics but he played the way analytics supports, he just had a bug up his butt.  They just call the strategy different things but the concepts are the same.

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, oblong said:

I do believe that those guys would struggle more in today's world where the pitchers are also doing analysis at a higher level.  Attitudes on pitching approach evolved so Mantle and Hornsby would be facing guys who are adjusting.  Williams would eat this **** up.

Of course I think the strategy for hitters has been the same but we have more ways of identifying and quantifying it so when guys say "they don't do that", they are, they just don't know it.  Like Joe Morgan being against analytics but he played the way analytics supports, he just had a bug up his butt.  They just call the strategy different things but the concepts are the same.

 

I think gifted talents like Mantle and Hornsby would adjust instinctively.  They wouldn't analyze anything and might have trouble if they were instucted to do so, but would probably be fine if left alone.  I agree that Williams would thrive in today's game because he would benefit from all the additional information.   

Posted
7 minutes ago, oblong said:

I do believe that those guys would struggle more in today's world where the pitchers are also doing analysis at a higher level.  Attitudes on pitching approach evolved so Mantle and Hornsby would be facing guys who are adjusting.  Williams would eat this **** up.

Of course I think the strategy for hitters has been the same but we have more ways of identifying and quantifying it so when guys say "they don't do that", they are, they just don't know it.  Like Joe Morgan being against analytics but he played the way analytics supports, he just had a bug up his butt.  They just call the strategy different things but the concepts are the same.

 

I think the one thing that has shifted wrt hitting in recent years is that as pitch velocity has climbed, hitting becomes more and more pure reaction capability. Everything you do today mechanics, technique, everything, has to serve the single purpose of giving the greatest possible time to make a swing decision. It's always been that way to some degree, but the degree keeps increasing. Tork's case is illustrative - he had to slow down his swing to gain more control of it and increase his contact, but he had to move back to get the time back needed for a slower swing. I'd really love to see them experiment with moving the mound back 1' at one of the minors levels just to see how it goes.

Posted

Chipper Jones recently said he would hit .200 in today's game. I'm sure he would have adjusted and performed better than that, but it emphasizes how much better pitching has become. When Chipper was drafted 1-1 the Tigers held the 2nd pick and took Tony Clark. They were so close to getting Chipper

Posted
51 minutes ago, papalawrence said:

Chipper Jones recently said he would hit .200 in today's game. I'm sure he would have adjusted and performed better than that, but it emphasizes how much better pitching has become. When Chipper was drafted 1-1 the Tigers held the 2nd pick and took Tony Clark. They were so close to getting Chipper

If he did everything the same way as he did when he played, then may he would have batted .200.  However, I don't think that argument holds, because if he was playing today he would have learned the game differently and would not have played the game the same way.  

Posted
50 minutes ago, 4hzglory said:

Baez is starting today 

That's what I was wondering, whether Baez will see a lot a lot more CF. Jace Jung is not coming up to be a DH—that's Colt Keith's job. 😁 So I am guessing he's going to get a lot of reps at third, and probably a few at second.

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, chasfh said:

That's what I was wondering, whether Baez will see a lot a lot more CF. Jace Jung is not coming up to be a DH—that's Colt Keith's job. 😁 So I am guessing he's going to get a lot of reps at third, and probably a few at second.

they have played Jung some at 2nd, which surprised me when I just looked it up. 7 games at 2B and 10 games at 3B. So Hinch will be able to keep the position line-up vego-matic going full tilt.  :classic_laugh:

Posted
47 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

they have played Jung some at 2nd, which surprised me when I just looked it up. 7 games at 2B and 10 games at 3B. So Hinch will be able to keep the position line-up vego-matic going full tilt.  :classic_laugh:

And why not?

Posted
3 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Some random clickbait on my FB..(so that is a strong negative caveat)...says Tigers are about to sign Tarik Skubal to a massive extension.  

We are trading Kriedler for Ohtani and LA is eating the full contract too

Posted
3 hours ago, chasfh said:

And why not?

Indeed. Sure, part of it was slowly hit balls and part was Sweeney not being as quick on the toss as he might be but tonight I was not impressed with Gleyber's DP pivots either.

Still holding my breath for when Javy gets a play at the wall in CF. He looked fine otherwise though.

Posted
10 hours ago, papalawrence said:

With all that Detroit has coming up, I would think at this point they are a desired destination if money is market rate. That said, Boros will convince Skubal to wait, unless an offer starts with a 4.

I would both fret over the fragility of a SP at a huge pay number over the life of a contract and be annoyed we couldn't keep a homegrown talent if we lost him.  Either way I'd rather we were closer to the 2012-2014 version of our payroll than the Tampa Bay Yankrays.  

Posted
10 hours ago, papalawrence said:

With all that Detroit has coming up, I would think at this point they are a desired destination if money is market rate. That said, Boros will convince Skubal to wait, unless an offer starts with a 4.

Meaning 4 years? I’m good with that. 😉

Posted
13 hours ago, papalawrence said:

With all that Detroit has coming up, I would think at this point they are a desired destination if money is market rate. That said, Boros will convince Skubal to wait, unless an offer starts with a 4.

Google's AI is using this post to feed their AI, it appears.

image.png.b9247c87a9bff2b3c022cc216f15dc75.png

Posted

I sense that Skubal would like to re-sign with Detroit, but he is not going to pass up a huge payday with rest-of-career security just to do so, and it's easy to understand why.

Posted

No way I am giving 400 million to a pitcher and neither is Mike I or Harris for that matter. This team's identity is now based on depth and not dependent on any one player. Many  "good" players and a few great ones before they become expensive and when they do flip them for more "good" players and added depth. That's how they will roll.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...