Tenacious D Posted Sunday at 01:51 AM Posted Sunday at 01:51 AM 4 minutes ago, Crazy Cat Gentleman said: 1⅔ for Sasaki. ha! Quote
chasfh Posted Sunday at 01:59 AM Posted Sunday at 01:59 AM 33 minutes ago, CMU97 said: We will see how the season plays out of course, but I think a big difference between the Harris/Hinch regime compared to anything else since Sparky, is that players are being told exactly what they need to do to play/stay in the big leagues. If they put in the work and show results, they will stay. If not, they are gone pretty quickly. None of this lets give them a huge leash and see what happens anymore. It is very refreshing from what we've had the past 7 years or so. And they are preforming. Battling. Getting better. So much better to watch. We can poo-poo Chris ilitch as much as we want, but he gets credit for hiring Harris and letting him do his thing. I am no longer pooing on Baby Doc. He’s won me over. I’m a convert. Quote
4hzglory Posted Sunday at 02:00 AM Posted Sunday at 02:00 AM 45 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: As far as I understand it, the total value of the contract - as everything, has to be amortized over the playing years of the contract for lux tax purposes. Deferrals are discounted at some percentage that represents somebody's guess about future inflation (MLBPA and owners negotiate this number I assume.....?). I don't know what the forumula is for dividing up a front bonus but I'd bet it's in there. Looking at Snells deal, the both the deferred money and the bonus are in the total, which is then divided into the 6 playing years of the deal for an annual lux tax charge of 31.3 M. So they get to spread out the charge on the bonus but all the dollars in the contract end up in the tax charge somewhere. Right, it would seem present value of the bonus shouldn’t be spread out IMO, if deferrals will reduce it. Quote
4hzglory Posted Sunday at 02:07 AM Posted Sunday at 02:07 AM 5 minutes ago, 4hzglory said: Right, it would seem present value of the bonus shouldn’t be spread out IMO, if deferrals will reduce it. Or at least charge the salary cap in future years for the amount not charged in the present value calculation. Example if Ohtani’s present value is 46 mil/yrover 10 years, charge the remaining 240 million to the cap over the years the deferrals are paid. Quote
Tigermojo Posted Sunday at 02:16 AM Posted Sunday at 02:16 AM Making Olson throw a lot of pitches. Quote
chasfh Posted Sunday at 02:44 AM Posted Sunday at 02:44 AM One batter too much for Reese. That’s a shame. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 02:48 AM Posted Sunday at 02:48 AM (edited) McKinstry got a glove on it, slowed it down which ended up hurting. Of course, every time this happens this year the question will be: Would Bregman have made that play? Edited Sunday at 02:49 AM by gehringer_2 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 02:59 AM Posted Sunday at 02:59 AM Middle/Middle hanging change. Goodbye baseball... Quote
chasfh Posted Sunday at 02:59 AM Posted Sunday at 02:59 AM 11 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: McKinstry got a glove on it, slowed it down which ended up hurting. Of course, every time this happens this year the question will be: Would Bregman have made that play? Not for the Tigers, since he was never coming here. 2 Quote
kdog Posted Sunday at 03:00 AM Posted Sunday at 03:00 AM Don't need to worry about RISP if you hit homers. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 03:03 AM Posted Sunday at 03:03 AM Tiger pitchers throwing OK - not getting beat up all that much, but too many mistake pitches Quote
chasfh Posted Sunday at 03:06 AM Posted Sunday at 03:06 AM (edited) And that’s how Jake Rogers can hit a triple. EDIT: New York might overturn it and pull the Dodgers’ ass out of the jackpot. EDIT 2: Maybe a make-up call by New York to let it stand, not as much of a biggie for their favorite team up three late. Edited Sunday at 03:09 AM by chasfh Quote
Crazy Cat Gentleman Posted Sunday at 03:07 AM Posted Sunday at 03:07 AM review time. we'll see about that. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 03:07 AM Posted Sunday at 03:07 AM they are going to overrule this. he took a couple of steps. Quote
Crazy Cat Gentleman Posted Sunday at 03:08 AM Posted Sunday at 03:08 AM did he get both feet down inbounds? 1 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 03:10 AM Posted Sunday at 03:10 AM 1 minute ago, Hongbit said: Wow. We got one if we can do anything with it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.