Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, CMU97 said:

We will see how the season plays out of course, but I think a big difference between the Harris/Hinch regime compared to anything else since Sparky, is that players are being told exactly what they need to do to play/stay in the big leagues. If they put in the work and show results, they will stay. If not, they are gone pretty quickly. None of this lets give them a huge leash and see what happens anymore. It is very refreshing from what we've had the past 7 years or so. And they are preforming. Battling. Getting better. So much better to watch. We can poo-poo Chris ilitch as much as we want, but he gets credit for hiring Harris and letting him do his thing. 

I am no longer pooing on Baby Doc. He’s won me over. I’m a convert.

Posted
45 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

As far as I understand it, the total value of the contract - as everything, has to be amortized over the playing years of the contract for lux tax purposes. Deferrals are discounted at some percentage that represents somebody's guess about future inflation (MLBPA and owners negotiate this number I assume.....?). I don't know what the forumula is for dividing up a front bonus but I'd bet it's in there.

Looking at Snells deal, the both the deferred money and the bonus are in the total, which is then divided into the 6 playing years of the deal for an annual lux tax charge of 31.3 M. So they get to spread out the charge on the bonus but all the dollars in the contract end up in the tax charge somewhere.

Right, it would seem present value of the bonus shouldn’t be spread out IMO, if deferrals will reduce it. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, 4hzglory said:

Right, it would seem present value of the bonus shouldn’t be spread out IMO, if deferrals will reduce it. 

Or at least charge the salary cap in future years for the amount not charged in the present value calculation.  Example if Ohtani’s present value is 46 mil/yrover 10 years, charge the remaining 240 million to the cap over the years the deferrals are paid.

Posted (edited)

McKinstry got a glove on it, slowed it down which ended up hurting.

Of course, every time this happens this year the question will be: Would Bregman have made that play?

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
11 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

McKinstry got a glove on it, slowed it down which ended up hurting.

Of course, every time this happens this year the question will be: Would Bregman have made that play?

Not for the Tigers, since he was never coming here.

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

And that’s how Jake Rogers can hit a triple.

EDIT: New York might overturn it and pull the Dodgers’ ass out of the jackpot.

EDIT 2: Maybe a make-up call by New York to let it stand, not as much of a biggie for their favorite team up three late.

Edited by chasfh

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...