Jump to content

POLITICS SCHMALITICS


romad1

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

I had to deal with the NC in Chicago as a traffic reporter. There were two companies in town at the time and both enforced the policy. So basically I had to find other employment for a year in order to make a move. 
 

The upside for me was I decided what I was doing between media jobs was more fun than dealing with the politics of my old job. I also figured out without the hour plus commute both ways I was coming out ahead of the game. 

It was weird. All the refinery services companies had them, but guys went from one firm to another all the time, in fact half the guys I worked with had worked for at least two of the major firms. There seemed to be enough ways to rewrite job descriptions that I don't know of anyone actually trying to enforce one - again probably because they were all guilty of raiding one another. The question is why they bothered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

This is the kind of action where the Biden administration is making deliberate efforts to force up wages in the US as the most direct was to increase social equity.

If they’re really looking for wage/income/wealth equity, they need to balance the scale on the other side by raising taxes and slashing abatements and subsidies on the ultra wealthy and their business activities. Otherwise all that’ll happen is they push the dollar down by making it cheaper overall and everything just costs commensurately more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

I had to deal with the NC in Chicago as a traffic reporter. There were two companies in town at the time and both enforced the policy. So basically I had to find other employment for a year in order to make a move. 
 

The upside for me was I decided what I was doing between media jobs was more fun than dealing with the politics of my old job. I also figured out without the hour plus commute both ways I was coming out ahead of the game. 

I don’t really understand the presumed benefit to the company of forcing a non-compete on a traffic reporter. It’s not like you have any trade secrets you can take over there that will put the other guy out of business. It simply seems punitive to you, and a way for colluding duopolists to maintain complete monopolistic control of its labor market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I don’t really understand the presumed benefit to the company of forcing a non-compete on a traffic reporter. It’s not like you have any trade secrets you can take over there that will put the other guy out of business. It simply seems punitive to you, and a way for colluding duopolists to maintain complete monopolistic control of its labor market.

a lot of local radio guys on Twitter were talking about this yesterday in such a way that the lack of a NC during the consolidation period would have been game changers.  When one station did their mass firings those guys couldn't work elsewhere even though another station might have wanted them.  It's a back scratching exercise.  I see it as a form of the collusion we saw in MLB in hte 80's.  Keep the talent pool off the market.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, oblong said:

a lot of local radio guys on Twitter were talking about this yesterday in such a way that the lack of a NC during the consolidation period would have been game changers.  When one station did their mass firings those guys couldn't work elsewhere even though another station might have wanted them.  It's a back scratching exercise.  I see it as a form of the collusion we saw in MLB in hte 80's.  Keep the talent pool off the market.  

Basically you had to leave the market and uproot your family if you wanted to stay employed in the industry. In my case I knew in advance the station group was switching services since they had just recently acquired the competition. 
In hindsight, it did seem a bit funny to me that after serving the non compete time, and then some I did work at the second company for a while. On my last day there the announcement came that the two companies were merging. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chasfh said:

If they’re really looking for wage/income/wealth equity, they need to balance the scale on the other side by raising taxes and slashing abatements and subsidies on the ultra wealthy and their business activities. Otherwise all that’ll happen is they push the dollar down by making it cheaper overall and everything just costs commensurately more.

Sure, but they know they can't raise taxes significantly without bigger legislative majorities, so the concept of increased backing of workers rights is a practical strategy to deal with political reality. I give them credit for having their feet on the ground and not letting ideality stand in the way of working practically.

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Sure, but they know they can't raise taxes significantly without bigger legislative majorities, so the concept of increased backing of workers rights is a practical strategy to deal with political reality. I give them credit for having their feet on the ground and not letting ideality stand in the way of working practically.

That's fair, but eventually, the realization is going to have to be that the scales can't be balanced by continuing to load everything onto only one side of it, in the service of working practically.

That's what makes the Republican position so seductively easy: there is no pretense to wanting to balance any economic scales between the classes, and as with the word 'class" itself, they have basically made "equity" a dirty word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pfife said:

WAPO push alert that an appeals court overturned Harvey Weinsteins conviction and ordered a new trial.

apparently over admission of evidence about events not at trial. Unless CA lets him off also he's not going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, pfife said:

WAPO push alert that an appeals court overturned Harvey Weinsteins conviction and ordered a new trial.

He had multiple convictions though so this only affects one of them.  He's still staying on Rikers and getting pounded probably.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming this story is on the level about its effectiveness, this is a great idea and hopefully all schools will be doing this soon. I can’t think of any real down sides to this. Read the story in a private window on your favorite browser. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is solid red, 90% white SW Va. they might as well be Kentucky or Tennessee

A Virginia school board voted early Friday to reinstate the original Confederate names of two public schools.

Why it matters: The Shenandoah County School Board's 5-1 vote in favor of the move appears to be the first such action since authorities began removing Confederate symbols from U.S. institutions and public spaces in 2020 following racial justice protests that erupted after the murder of George Floyd.

State of play: The vote reverses the board's decision in 2020 to remove the local elementary and high schools' association with Civil War-era Confederate leaders Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Turner Ashby.

Consequently, Mountain View High School will revert to being called Stonewall Jackson High School and Honey Run Elementary School will again be called Ashby-Lee Elementary School.

 

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/10/virginia-school-board-vote-restore-confederate-names?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiospm&stream=top

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

This is solid red, 90% white SW Va. they might as well be Kentucky or Tennessee

A Virginia school board voted early Friday to reinstate the original Confederate names of two public schools.

Why it matters: The Shenandoah County School Board's 5-1 vote in favor of the move appears to be the first such action since authorities began removing Confederate symbols from U.S. institutions and public spaces in 2020 following racial justice protests that erupted after the murder of George Floyd.

State of play: The vote reverses the board's decision in 2020 to remove the local elementary and high schools' association with Civil War-era Confederate leaders Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Turner Ashby.

Consequently, Mountain View High School will revert to being called Stonewall Jackson High School and Honey Run Elementary School will again be called Ashby-Lee Elementary School.

 

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/10/virginia-school-board-vote-restore-confederate-names?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiospm&stream=top

Apparently there were plenty of people at the public meetings registering their opposition to the moves.  I keep chiding the people at work about the schools in Loudon County who had all their school named after principles or properties (e.g. Liberty, Freedom, Heritage): because they couldn't agree on names since the big bad woke crowd took away their ability to name Eva Hitler (nee Braun) Elementary or Charles Manson Middle School.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, romad1 said:

Apparently there were plenty of people at the public meetings registering their opposition to the moves.  I keep chiding the people at work about the schools in Loudon County who had all their school named after principles or properties (e.g. Liberty, Freedom, Heritage): because they couldn't agree on names since the big bad woke crowd took away their ability to name Eva Hitler (nee Braun) Elementary or Charles Manson Middle School.

In this particular county the schools were renamed for Confederate "heroes" in 1959, it was part of the massive resistance movement over desegregation. It was done by racist assholes the (See the Byrd Machine) and is being done by a bunch of assholes now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, chasfh said:

They would argue that the Confederacy is more American than anyone or anything not wired in to Trump could ever be.

I used to listen to this "the South will rise again" talk while I was in the Air Force and I would always say.  "Yes, that is why all the strategic air command bases are in the North" (which isn't technically true but the ICBMs are). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2024 at 8:08 AM, chasfh said:

If they’re really looking for wage/income/wealth equity, they need to balance the scale on the other side by raising taxes and slashing abatements and subsidies on the ultra wealthy and their business activities. 

The wealthy don't want that and they always get what they want.   We live in a world designed by the weathy for the benefit of the wealthy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

The wealthy don't want that and they always get what they want.   We live in a world designed by the weathy for the benefit of the wealthy.  

this is the functional shift in approach that Biden is attempting. They recognize that the political difficulty of raising taxes for new transfer payments is pretty close to impossible. It's going to be a big enough lift just to increase the FICA cap to put Social Security back on a better footing in the near future. So instead do everything you can to push wages for the lower half of the economy. It's easier to build winning political coalitions for those things. Even if it is somewhat inflationary, increasing economic equity is simply more important to holding togeher the fraying social cohesion in the US than another 0.5% on the inflation rate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Even if it is somewhat inflationary, increasing economic equity is simply more important to holding togeher the fraying social cohesion in the US than another 0.5% on the inflation rate.

From your mouth to the ears of (hopefully) most Americans. I’m probably delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

The wealthy don't want that and they always get what they want.   We live in a world designed by the weathy for the benefit of the wealthy.  

That’s why I led with “if”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...