Jump to content

Coronavirus: Already In a Neighborhood Near You


chasfh

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Jim Cowan said:

They also said that the percentage of total population...total population..is 62%.  You could not have missed it.

I'll type real slow this time:

65 & up: 90%
12-65: 70%
5-12: 65%

All that's left are those under 5. You/they can't get 62% overall unless you/they are either very bad at math, or are being deceitful. I'll assume you're math deficient.

In either case, when we are dealing with such fuzzy numbers I'm not going to answer why one country's number is higher or lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Fox Wismic said:

I'll type real slow this time:

65 & up: 90%
12-65: 70%
5-12: 65%

All that's left are those under 5. You/they can't get 62% overall unless you/they are either very bad at math, or are being deceitful. I'll assume you're math deficient.

In either case, when we are dealing with such fuzzy numbers I'm not going to answer why one country's number is higher or lower.

62% = fully vaccinated.  74% = one or more doses.  

Now, you can answer Mr Cowan's question.  

Edited by Tiger337
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Fox Wismic said:

I'll type real slow this time:

65 & up: 90%
12-65: 70%
5-12: 65%

All that's left are those under 5. You/they can't get 62% overall unless you/they are either very bad at math, or are being deceitful. I'll assume you're math deficient.

In either case, when we are dealing with such fuzzy numbers I'm not going to answer why one country's number is higher or lower.

Instead of typing real slow, you should read more carefully.  The CDC table does not say ages 5-12 have a 65.6% rate.  It says that everybody 5 and over has a 65.6% rate.  Big difference, yes?  So, it is only logical that for the total population the rate is lower, such as 62%.  You have a chance to admit that you misread the data here, it would help establish some credibility.

So, Americans die from Covid at a rate more than 3 times that Canadians do.  I feel certain that you have a theory about why that is.  Why won't you tell us?  What would be the harm?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jim Cowan said:

I have some numbers for consideration:

USA:  Vax 62% of total population, deaths per million 2,500

Canada:  Vax 82% of total population, deaths per milion 788

So, to review:  presented above are 4 numbers that are absolutely correct and cannot be disputed.

Fox, do you have a theory about why more than two thirds of American deaths appear to have been completely unnecessary?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can't see numbers being juggled here, I can't help you overcome your bias for trusting govt as your daddy.

Do a search. You'll find a dozen sites giving 62% as of October. Now you're saying 62% as of yesterday. So NOBODY has been vaxxed in the US since October? Can you guys even really believe that?

If we've got 70% of those 12 & up fully vaxxed, there must be virtually nobody under 12 who has been vaxxed to bring the number down that low. Are even you guys so biased that you believe that? Odds are better that your interpretation of those stats is amiss. The math makes much more sense as I presented it.

What you haven't answered is why the problem is increasing as more people get vaxxed? When 100% of the people were unvaxxed we weren't getting these numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Fox Wismic said:

You'll find a dozen sites giving 62% as of October. Now you're saying 62% as of yesterday. So NOBODY has been vaxxed in the US since October? Can you guys even really believe that?

There is a very simple reason for this - at least in MI, which is that as the vaccine was sequentially approved for younger people the denominator in the percentage calculation increased and the % vaccinated dropped, then eventually got back to the previous level when enough new vaccinations had occurred to get the the same percentage of a now larger target population. This has all been explained on the Mich Covid (MDPH) site at each stage of the process - approval to 12 yrs and then approval to 5 yrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Fox Wismic said:

If you can't see numbers being juggled here, I can't help you overcome your bias for trusting govt as your daddy.

Do a search. You'll find a dozen sites giving 62% as of October. Now you're saying 62% as of yesterday. So NOBODY has been vaxxed in the US since October? Can you guys even really believe that?

If we've got 70% of those 12 & up fully vaxxed, there must be virtually nobody under 12 who has been vaxxed to bring the number down that low. Are even you guys so biased that you believe that? Odds are better that your interpretation of those stats is amiss. The math makes much more sense as I presented it.

What you haven't answered is why the problem is increasing as more people get vaxxed? When 100% of the people were unvaxxed we weren't getting these numbers.

It hasn't stayed the same.  It's going up slowly.  It was 57% in October, 62% now.  

https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also dropped a "you just ad hom'd" blast on his first day then repeatedly ad hom's about trusting the government.    Pure trolling.  Typical trumper - higher standards for everyone else than he holds himself to.

Edited by pfife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, pfife said:

He also dropped a "you just ad hom'd" blast on his first day then repeatedly ad hom's about trusting the government.    Pure trolling.  Typical trumper - higher standards for everyone else than he holds himself to.

You clearly don't know what ad hominem is. I don't trust the govt, that's the point. I'm not a Trumper. My friends (some of whom are) would laugh at you for that slander.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiger337 said:

He hasn't found a site with that bullet point yet.  

I gave myriads of evidence for my claims as those things happened. I just don't have time to search my archives a year or two ago to give them again. I have a life away from this forum. When I can, I will, even though you guys will ignore it anyway and call for me to be banned.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fox Wismic said:

I gave myriads of evidence for my claims as those things happened. I just don't have time to search my archives a year or two ago to give them again. I have a life away from this forum. When I can, I will, even though you guys will ignore it anyway and call for me to be banned.

You rarely present links with credible evidence and when you do you interpret it incorrectly.  I will continue to ignore or mock links to right wing extremist fraud sites, but I have not called for your banning.  I don't give up on people very easily.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiger337 said:

Says the guy who wants to kick people out of the country if they don't agree with his Libertarian fantasies.  

I don't want to kick anybody out. I've suggested those who want to live in a govt-oppressed society are free to move to one of the many places where they can experience that so those of us who cherish liberty can stay in the country our forebears founded that way.

That should make all of us happy. Why are you not happy unless my liberties are being infringed upon?

My friend ST, who moved to Cuba, learned the hard way. He had to experience it in the real world, not in imagination like you guys. He came back. He appreciates America (and he's a liberal Democrat).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

I will continue to ignore or mock links to right wing extremist fraud sites, but I have not called for your banning.

You mean, any site that disagrees with your leftist bias. Some here have called for my banning, simply for disagreeing with them. That is the definition of a Snowflake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Fox Wismic said:

You mean, any site that disagrees with your leftist bias. Some here have called for my banning, simply for disagreeing with them. That is the definition of a Snowflake.

lol I called for your banning because you're a spamming troll.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Fox Wismic said:

I don't want to kick anybody out. I've suggested those who want to live in a govt-oppressed society are free to move to one of the many places where they can experience that so those of us who cherish liberty can stay in the country our forebears founded that way.

James Madison, John Jay, Roger Sherman and a few other gentleman may disagree with you

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna1274477

Edited by CMRivdogs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...