Tigerbomb13 Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 No chance in hell this man can ever sniff the president again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Stranger things have happened.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Trump tried to commandeer the Beast... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Trump WANTED TO GO TO THE CAPITOL JFC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romad1 Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 1 minute ago, mtutiger said: Oh My God This is the bombshell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Worse than the 18 minutes of erased tapes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 this is pretty crazy shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 And yet they didn't invoke the 25th Amendment. This testimony proves he wasn't fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 New Rule: if a future President ever throws plates against a wall like a five year old, they get an automatic 25th Amendment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Just reinforces all the Toddler in Chief comments. TFG has the emotional stability of a 4 year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Worse than the 18 minutes of erased tapes. This is so much worse than Watergate.... Watergate is nothing compared to this **** 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 29 minutes ago, romad1 said: "those people aren't here to hurt ME" That quote sums up everything about Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Just now, mtutiger said: This is so much worse than Watergate.... Watergate is nothing compared to this **** If you look at all the other stuff around campaign finances and CREEP. Nixon's re-election still pales in comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smr-nj Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 A damn maniac in the Oval office. A violent sociopath, who didn’t give a damn that he showed criminal intent from start to finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.TaterSalad Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 I wanted to quote Fife but couldn't find the post, so I'll try to recreate it: @Archie anything you care to say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: If you look at all the other stuff around campaign finances and CREEP. Nixon's re-election still pales in comparison. Of course... and outside of Nixon's state of mind at the end, generally speaking, the amount of lives theoretically put in danger is a massive difference. It's just not a comparison.... but we live in a different, more polarized time now. Setting aside what potentially could happen legally, just politically, there was a time when all of this would be devestating. Nowadays, unfortunately, it may hurt a little on the margins but otherwise he'll still continue to hold his sway. Edited June 28, 2022 by mtutiger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 ketchup All you need to know. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motown Bombers Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Just now, mtutiger said: Of course... and outside of Nixon's state of mind at the end, generally speaking, the amount of lives theoretically put in danger is a massive difference. It's just not a comparison.... but we live in a different, more polarized time now. Setting aside what potentially could happen legally, just politically, there was a time when all of this would be devestating. Nowadays, unfortunately, I doubt it. There was a time when Trump wouldn't have ever won a nomination much less become president. There was a time even if he got elected, he would have been impeached and removed a long time ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted June 28, 2022 Author Share Posted June 28, 2022 “They’re not here to hurt me” strikes me as a more crucial statement than it is getting attention for rat the moment. How Trump said this phrase is really crucial. The way Hutchinson testified, he basically said, kind of flatly, “they’re not here to hurt me”, maybe even a little emphasis on hurt. That would suggest they otherwise are there for something else, such as “they’re here to love me instead”, or “they’re here to praise me instead.” Something like that. But if the way he said it put the emphasis on a different word—as in, “they’re not here to hurt me”—then we’re talking about a whole ‘nother kettle of fish. Because then the alternative could only be, “they’re here to hurt someone else”. And we all know who that someone else is. And that would mean he had foreknowledge of impending violence, and might even suggest even that he would approve of it. I kind of doubt they’ll try to follow up on that, but I think that’s a pretty important distinction. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 (edited) Roger Stone was a "trickster" working for CREEP during the 1972 election. He was one of several college age wannabes who attempted to disrupt opponents campaigns. He also has a portrait of Nixon tattooed on his back. CREEP was under former AG John Mitchell Edited June 28, 2022 by CMRivdogs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 While I think the testimony was damning, I actually think it will make him even more appealing to MAGAs for a few reasons: (1) He didn't want them take away guns (2) He actually did try to join them at the capital. (3) He tried to physically attack his RINO secret service person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.