ewsieg Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 5 minutes ago, pfife said: lol "it's obvious that....." and then a bunch of not evidence, and an admission that you actually don't know whether or not it mattered. total snoozer per yoosh Emails exist on the laptop, which "finally" is confirmed as Hunter Biden's, which show emails where they indicate 'Hunter to hold 10% for the big guy', along with other emails where Hunter and others refer to Joe as 'the big guy' along with other corroborated evidence. Add in the fact of how it was handled by Biden administration. I know you get upset when I say this, but I say it because it is true, if it was Biden (R), you'd demand questions from the MSM and demand answers from Biden (R). If MSM does ever push for answers here, whatever Biden says, you'll accept, but you wouldn't if it were the same answers from Biden (R). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 13 minutes ago, ewsieg said: Emails exist on the laptop, which "finally" is confirmed as Hunter Biden's, which show emails where they indicate 'Hunter to hold 10% for the big guy', along with other emails where Hunter and others refer to Joe as 'the big guy' along with other corroborated evidence. Add in the fact of how it was handled by Biden administration. I know you get upset when I say this, but I say it because it is true, if it was Biden (R), you'd demand questions from the MSM and demand answers from Biden (R). If MSM does ever push for answers here, whatever Biden says, you'll accept, but you wouldn't if it were the same answers from Biden (R). I don't know why you waste time arguing with the troll. He's either not old enough to comprehend what he reads or just wants to twist what is posted. I put him on ignore a long time ago and he's the only person I've ever done that to on a few political boards I posted at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Archie said: I don't know why you waste time arguing with the troll. He's either not old enough to comprehend what he reads or just wants to twist what is posted. I put him on ignore a long time ago and he's the only person I've ever done that to on a few political boards I posted at. LOL cry more. Everyone knows you ignore me because you can't keep up with me. Edited March 26, 2022 by pfife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, ewsieg said: Emails exist on the laptop, which "finally" is confirmed as Hunter Biden's, which show emails where they indicate 'Hunter to hold 10% for the big guy', along with other emails where Hunter and others refer to Joe as 'the big guy' along with other corroborated evidence. Add in the fact of how it was handled by Biden administration. I know you get upset when I say this, but I say it because it is true, if it was Biden (R), you'd demand questions from the MSM and demand answers from Biden (R). If MSM does ever push for answers here, whatever Biden says, you'll accept, but you wouldn't if it were the same answers from Biden (R). I feel absolutely no need to defend something I never said or did in a world that doesn't exist just because you managed to type it out. Let me know when you're "finally" interested in reality Edited March 26, 2022 by pfife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 47 minutes ago, Archie said: I don't know why you waste time arguing with the troll. He's either not old enough to comprehend what he reads or just wants to twist what is posted. I put him on ignore a long time ago and he's the only person I've ever done that to on a few political boards I posted at. Pot-Kettle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 1 minute ago, CMRivdogs said: Pot-Kettle Except I'm not a pot or kettle in that scenario 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 (edited) Also Esweig, feel free to post said confirmation of Hunter's laptop and authentication of the specific emails referenced. That is, if you're done literally making shit up about me. Edited March 26, 2022 by pfife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: Pot-Kettle I rather think of us all as finely glazed Ollas here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted March 26, 2022 Author Share Posted March 26, 2022 2 hours ago, Archie said: I don't know why you waste time arguing with the troll. He's either not old enough to comprehend what he reads or just wants to twist what is posted. I put him on ignore a long time ago and he's the only person I've ever done that to on a few political boards I posted at. lol @pfife “not old enough” for … well, anything, really. I think the only thing he might not be old enough for is being the Pope. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewsieg Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 1 hour ago, pfife said: Also Esweig, feel free to post said confirmation of Hunter's laptop and authentication of the specific emails referenced. That is, if you're done literally making shit up about me. NYT authenticated the emails, it was actually pretty big news. I'll even post this, which I know you're going to skim to point out a specific portion that points out the laptop as a whole hasn't been verified. Of the emails on the laptop that NYT's verified are the two that actually are legitimate pieces of information in relation to POTUS. Quote There were two supposed “smoking guns” about Joe Biden that conservatives touted in the materials. The first was an email the Post called a “blockbuster,” in which an executive at the Ukrainian gas company Burisma thanked Hunter for the “opportunity to meet your father” in 2015. If you’re steeped in Trumpworld lore, this was damning because of the theory that Biden had the corrupt prosecutor general of Ukraine fired to benefit Burisma, and Biden had said he knew nothing about Hunter’s Ukrainian work, but look, a meeting! (Apparently, it was a dinner at Cafe Milano that Hunter had organized, with about a dozen people.) This appears to amount to Vice President Biden seemingly going to one dinner. The second involved a business venture that Hunter tried to set up with a Chinese energy tycoon in 2017 (after Joe Biden was no longer vice president). One email mentions that the equity split would include “10 held by H for the big guy ?” A former business partner of Hunter’s named Tony Bobulinski came forward to claim “the big guy” was Joe Biden. But a subsequent email from Hunter says his “Chairman” gave him “an emphatic no,” and a further email clarifies that the chairman is his dad. So this amounts to Joe Biden apparently refusing some deal Hunter tried to enmesh him in. Again, not saying either of these are damning. But to someone that doesn't simply follow anything a (D) says or the media that backs them, it raises questions. As i've mentioned before with Biden/Ukraine, it's not that he necessarily had a conflict of interest as on paper, he was eliminating a prosecutor that was corrupt himself and not going after potentially corrupt businesses, including possibly Burisma. But even Obama's team was worried about the appearance of a COI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 (edited) So it was a venture that never happened????? And when it didn't happen BIden wasn't even in government? And joe Biden refused it anyways? Lmao. What a freaking disaster of an argument you're making. Maybe you're better off just making shit up about me. Edited March 26, 2022 by pfife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1984Echoes Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, ewsieg said: NYT authenticated the emails, it was actually pretty big news. I'll even post this, which I know you're going to skim to point out a specific portion that points out the laptop as a whole hasn't been verified. Of the emails on the laptop that NYT's verified are the two that actually are legitimate pieces of information in relation to POTUS. Again, not saying either of these are damning. But to someone that doesn't simply follow anything a (D) says or the media that backs them, it raises questions. As i've mentioned before with Biden/Ukraine, it's not that he necessarily had a conflict of interest as on paper, he was eliminating a prosecutor that was corrupt himself and not going after potentially corrupt businesses, including possibly Burisma. But even Obama's team was worried about the appearance of a COI. You apparently are ignoring two key points: 1) This appears to amount to Vice President Biden seemingly going to one dinner. 2) The second involved a business venture that Hunter tried to set up ... So this amounts to Joe Biden apparently refusing some deal Hunter tried to enmesh him in. In other words: Much Ado about NOTHING. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 (edited) Right. He didn't even read his own damn article. An absolute unadulterated crock. Edited March 26, 2022 by pfife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted March 26, 2022 Author Share Posted March 26, 2022 19 minutes ago, ewsieg said: NYT authenticated the emails, it was actually pretty big news. I'll even post this, which I know you're going to skim to point out a specific portion that points out the laptop as a whole hasn't been verified. Of the emails on the laptop that NYT's verified are the two that actually are legitimate pieces of information in relation to POTUS. Again, not saying either of these are damning. But to someone that doesn't simply follow anything a (D) says or the media that backs them, it raises questions. As i've mentioned before with Biden/Ukraine, it's not that he necessarily had a conflict of interest as on paper, he was eliminating a prosecutor that was corrupt himself and not going after potentially corrupt businesses, including possibly Burisma. But even Obama's team was worried about the appearance of a COI. Link to what you quoted, please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewsieg Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 19 minutes ago, chasfh said: Link to what you quoted, please? sorry, meant to add it https://www.vox.com/22992772/hunter-biden-laptop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 3 hours ago, chasfh said: lol @pfife “not old enough” for … well, anything, really. I think the only thing he might not be old enough for is being the Pope. 😉 I've belonged to a few forums and never had to ignore or block anyone. About two days here and it was obvious he was just stirring the post. I would make a comment and he would argue that I said something else. I don't know what he was reading or if he was reading at all but he was just making shit up. I only see him in quotes now and that's bad enough. I wish I didn't have to block him but that's on him, not me. I look at it as his loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 5 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: Pot-Kettle Everything I post is true. We have a difference in political opinion. That doesn't mean what I post is not true. It might mean that you don't want to believe it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 I'm working at it Sue, really I am. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 23 minutes ago, Archie said: That doesn't mean what I post is not true. Doesn't mean that it is either... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 Seems pretty lunatic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smr-nj Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 59 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: I'm working at it Sue, really I am. I’m baking you a cake… because of your resolve. 😁🎂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Archie said: I've belonged to a few forums and never had to ignore or block anyone. About two days here and it was obvious he was just stirring the post. I would make a comment and he would argue that I said something else. I don't know what he was reading or if he was reading at all but he was just making shit up. I only see him in quotes now and that's bad enough. I wish I didn't have to block him but that's on him, not me. I look at it as his loss. you have me blocked and steal my lines. Interesting. Sorry about your safespace Edited March 27, 2022 by pfife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 2 hours ago, Archie said: Everything I post is true. Except this is obviously false Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Cowan Posted March 27, 2022 Share Posted March 27, 2022 Meathead: Oh, so I suppose that the church you go to is the right one, eh Arch? AB: Well, I'd be pretty stupid if it wasn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.