Jump to content

Cleanup in Aisle Lunatic (h/t romad1)


chasfh

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, chasfh said:

Benjamin Ginsburg, Republican Elections Attorney. Very direct, confident, and adamant that all Trump claims were baseless.

Clearly he must be a globalist agent of the deep state. 😏

Ginsburg just basically said on CNN that we have to hold Trump and his campaign accountable, not for the fraud, apparently, but basically for not accepting the decision of the courts and for trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.

But Ginsburg also believes that the consequence should be, not an indictment and a conviction in any court of law, but some realization about “their role in history” and how they’re absolutely “torched” about it, and then Congress should “take a look” at legislation to “ensure nothing like this happens again”.

So, basically, according to Ginsburg, any penalty for Trump should not happen now, but in some undefined future, and not anything in real terms, but something in ethereal terms, and presumably only after he’s dead and won’t be around to give a shit about any of this anymore.

For the good of the country, I presume?

Edited by chasfh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Ginsburg just basically said on CNN that we have to hold Trump and his campaign accountable, not for the fraud, apparently, but basically for not accepting the decision of the courts and for trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.

But Ginsburg also believes the consequence should be, not an indictment and a conviction in any court of law, but for some realization about “their role in history” and how they’re absolutely “torched” about it, and then Congress should “take a look” at legislation to “ensure nothing like this happens again”.

So, basically, according to Ginsburg, any penalty for Trump should not happen now, but in some undefined future, presumably after he’s dead and won’t be around to give a shit about any of this anymore.

For the good of the country, I presume?

Not enough. It's not that he 'didn't accept' the results, it's that he actively used lies and deception to try to motivate a rejection of the results, by force if he could swing it if not by abuse of the courts and media if he couldn't. That's a damn site more than 'not accepting' and needs a lot more sanction than a harsh judgment by history.

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

TV ministers have been doing it for years. Before that itinerate "snake oil" salesmen. Not to mention politicians.  Poor and desperate people fall for these scams, the ones we think know better and just riding his coat tails for the power and money.

Exactly why some people don't want critical thinking taught in schools. Or even money management.

This is not unlike the same psychology that leads to poor people playing the numbers, or scratch-offs, or convenience store slot machines, or those machines that look like they’re gonna slide a whole bunch of quarters to you if you put in just one more. Just risk a little money and you could hit it big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Not enough. It's not that he 'didn't accept' the results, it's that he actively used lies and deception to try to motivate a rejection of the results, by force if he could swing it if not by abuse of the courts and media if he couldn't. That's a damn site more than 'not accepting' and needs a lot more sanction than a harsh judgment by history.

It looks for all the world that Ginsburg is hedging his bets that Trump might come out of this a winner, and he wants to reduce his sentence for treason when Trump does win.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

TV ministers have been doing it for years. Before that itinerate "snake oil" salesmen. Not to mention politicians.  Poor and desperate people fall for these scams, the ones we think know better and just riding his coat tails for the power and money.

Exactly why some people don't want critical thinking taught in schools. Or even money management.

20 Things You Didn't Know About Licence To Kill (1989) – Page 8

"Bless your heart..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gehringer_2 said:

Not enough. It's not that he 'didn't accept' the results, it's that he used lies and deception to try to motivate a rejection of the results, by force if he could swing it if not by abuse of the courts and media if he couldn't. That's a damn site more than 'not accepting' and needs a lot more sanction than a harsh judgment by history.

He is not going to be indicted and a substantial percentage of Republicans will still believe the election was stolen.  I  am not sure what I am hoping for realistically - maybe that he becomes upopular enough so that neither he nor anybody in his family can ever come close to winning an election again.  If enouh people can see that he is a whack job maybe right wing nut jobs won't be able to win elections so easily in the future.  The fear is this whole thing gets forgotten by July like everything else involving Trump.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

He is not going to be indicted and a substantial percentage of Republicans will still believe the election was stolen.  I  am not sure what I am hoping for realistically - maybe that he becomes upopular enough so that neither he nor anybody in his family can ever come close to winning an election again.  If enouh people can see that he is a whack job maybe right wing nut jobs won't be able to win elections so easily in the future.  The fear is this whole thing gets forgotten by July like everything else involving Trump.  

Democrats will lose because 

a706103e-959e-4c35-b528-ef9984825a52_750

and there will be no accountability in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

He is not going to be indicted and a substantial percentage of Republicans will still believe the election was stolen.  I  am not sure what I am hoping for realistically - maybe that he becomes upopular enough so that neither he nor anybody in his family can ever come close to winning an election again.  If enouh people can see that he is a whack job maybe right wing nut jobs won't be able to win elections so easily in the future.  The fear is this whole thing gets forgotten by July like everything else involving Trump.  

I think if they lay out all this evidence and then fail to indict Trump, basically making this whole thing a political stunt, he will become more popular with the red hats than ever, since it will show that he is indeed the most powerful person in the world, bulletproof and unable to be taken down by the woke radical left mob, and that he is the true North Star of the future of the world.

It might even radicalize a few current moderate right-of-center conservatives who might look at all this pomp and circumstance, see how nothing actually happened, and conclude that we really do live in a Deep State Democrat tyranny that uses its power to punish their opponents politically.

If Trump comes out of this unscathed, it’s not just that democracy would die. It’s also that the very idea of democracy will be completely discredited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

He is not going to be indicted and a substantial percentage of Republicans will still believe the election was stolen.  I  am not sure what I am hoping for realistically - maybe that he becomes upopular enough so that neither he nor anybody in his family can ever come close to winning an election again.  If enouh people can see that he is a whack job maybe right wing nut jobs won't be able to win elections so easily in the future.  The fear is this whole thing gets forgotten by July like everything else involving Trump.  

"Right Wing Wack Jobs" will just get craftier. Just look at Virginia where the current governor managed to walk a fine line between trying to ignore Trump and embrace his policies without the bluster and vitriol. When you have 40 plus percent of the voting population baked in just because they have an R beside their name it's an uphill battle.

Organizing Democratic voters is like herding cats.  Republicans are like sheep it just takes a couple of crafty dogs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chasfh said:

I think if they lay out all this evidence and then fail to indict Trump, basically making this whole thing a political stunt, he will become more popular with the red hats than ever, since it will show that he is indeed the most powerful person in the world, bulletproof and unable to be taken down by the woke radical left mob, and that he is the true North Star of the future of the world.

It might even radicalize a few current moderate right-of-center conservatives who might look at all this pomp and circumstance, see how nothing actually happened, and conclude that we really do live in a Deep State Democrat tyranny that uses its power to punish their opponents politically.

If Trump comes out of this unscathed, it’s not just that democracy would die. It’s also that the very idea of democracy will be completely discredited.

And yet, when the Republicans did that with Benghazi and Hillary, Democrats had their purity test and she lost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gehringer_2 said:

Indicting him and losing the case in a public prosectution might not be the worst thing. After all, who besides the 12 nuts on that jury still believed OJ was innocent after that trial?

I remember a lot of people celebrating, mostly blacks, when OJ was acquitted. Whether they thought he was truly innocent or not is another matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

And yet, when the Republicans did that with Benghazi and Hillary, Democrats had their purity test and she lost. 

IDK - do you think Benghazi made any difference to anyone? My take is more that Hillary suffered from her own baggage from the Clinton admin (e.g. sweetheart investment deals with Tyson etc) and her own personality issues than any fallout from the Benghazi hearings in particular. Those struck me as more a matter of preaching to the converted I would think. And she put off the progressive wing for a lot of reasons. But  that's just my personal take. Maybe those hearings did get some traction with independents.....

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night, one of my softball teammates, who occupies some mythical “well-informed middle” on the whole thing (as though anyone well-informed would form no opinion on any of this), said he was unimpressed by the first hearing because he said we didn’t learn anything new. I mentioned how we learned that the violence was all pre-planned, and how Trump pushed the fraud claim even after he knew he had lost, and my teammate said well, we already knew this, didn’t we? What’s new about that?

He had me for a minute because, yes, this had all been talked about for the last year and a half, ever since the Capitol attack happened, and it really does seem like old news—until I came to realize that the big difference now is that all this was just Twitter speculation before, whereas now, we have actual sworn testimony to all of this, which carries the imprimatur of legal truth. That’s the big difference.

Once I shared this thought with him, he had an “aha” moment about it.

 

Edited by chasfh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

He is not going to be indicted and a substantial percentage of Republicans will still believe the election was stolen.  I  am not sure what I am hoping for realistically - maybe that he becomes upopular enough so that neither he nor anybody in his family can ever come close to winning an election again.  If enouh people can see that he is a whack job maybe right wing nut jobs won't be able to win elections so easily in the future.  The fear is this whole thing gets forgotten by July like everything else involving Trump.  

I don't have many hopes that much will arise from this, but for reasons of history and knowledge, it is a good thing that they are getting this on the record and giving the public the opportunity to learn from it. And doing so in the most sober way possible.

I get that there is a desire for certain political outcomes to arise from this, but the idea that nothing comes of it doesn't mean that the exercise isn't worth it or doesn't make it meaningless.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mtutiger said:

I don't have many hopes that much will arise from this, but for reasons of history and knowledge, it is a good thing that they are getting this on the record and giving the public the opportunity to learn from it. And doing so in the most sober way possible.

I get that there is a desire for certain political outcomes to arise from this, but the idea that nothing comes of it doesn't mean that the exercise isn't worth it or doesn't make it meaningless.

I think nothing will come out of it.  The historical political record is important to political historians like some people here, but how many people will care about that?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harking back to Watergate for a moment. It really wasn't until John Dean's testimony and more importantly the revelations about the missing 18 minutes on the taping system that the reality of what was happening at the time was significant.

If I recall correctly, it really wasn't until the vote of the House Impeachment Committee that reality really didn't set in. Times are different, the two parties are more divided now than in 1974. I'd really like to know what turned so many of what we thought were conservative but not crazy Republicans to the dark side?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiger337 said:

I think nothing will come out of it.  The historical political record is important to political historians like some people here, but how many people will care about that?  

I'm not a political historian, nor are a lot of my family or friends who may be following this. But people still want to understand what actually happened as opposed to just saying "he's always been a fraud, nothing is gonna happen to him, who cares, nothing matters".

And from that knowledge educate future generations on what happened here in order to help future generations avoid the mistakes that we made by electing this clown. Because, while I don't know what comes next, but Trump is gonna die someday... and, along with him, a lot of his influence. And they may have the opportunity to fix a lot of the wrongs we are seeing today.

I know this is probably a bit "glass half full" for this board, but being constantly negative all the time accomplishes nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

Harking back to Watergate for a moment. It really wasn't until John Dean's testimony and more importantly the revelations about the missing 18 minutes on the taping system that the reality of what was happening at the time was significant.

If I recall correctly, it really wasn't until the vote of the House Impeachment Committee that reality really didn't set in. Times are different, the two parties are more divided now than in 1974. I'd really like to know what turned so many of what we thought were conservative but not crazy Republicans to the dark side?

Obama.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      282
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Jeff M
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...