Jump to content

Cleanup in Aisle Lunatic (h/t romad1)


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

Roger Stone was a "trickster" working for CREEP during the 1972 election. He was one of several college age wannabes who attempted to disrupt opponents campaigns.

He also has a portrait of Nixon tattooed on his back.

CREEP was under former AG John Mitchell

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

I’m excited to see how the FoxNews crew is going to spin this one.   Tucker is going to have dig deep into his infinite bag bullshit.  

He'll just simply talk about something else.  He will make fun of pop stars swearing about Roe.

Posted

They'll go back to digging dirt on Hunter Biden completely ignoring Ivanka Trumps Chinese interests while she was officially on the White House staff, and Jared's under the table deals with the Saudis 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, oblong said:

Cassidy is 26 years old?

Talk about courage.  More so than anyone else I've seen in that White House.

 

25 is what I heard.  She's got the guts of someone who comes from a trust fund.  Don't know if she does. 

Posted
1 minute ago, oblong said:

Cassidy is 26 years old?

Talk about courage.  More so than anyone else I've seen in that White House.

 

I had her pegged for early 30s, and she was very poised for that age.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said:

Done

By calling her a “leaker”, Donald Trump just confirmed that Hutchinson is telling the truth. Otherwise, he’d be calling her a “liar”.

Posted
13 minutes ago, romad1 said:

25 is what I heard.  She's got the guts of someone who comes from a trust fund.  Don't know if she does. 

The AP states that she’s 25 and her home town is Williamsburg, VA. 

Her bio is very interesting and impressive. 

Posted

I missed the first hour, watching some of that now, but this one is quite damning.  And as mentioned above, while not as sexy, the obstruction comments at the end of the hearing might be the biggest news of all.  

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

I missed the first hour, watching some of that now, but this one is quite damning.  And as mentioned above, while not as sexy, the obstruction comments at the end of the hearing might be the biggest news of all.  

I'm no lawyer, but the hearing seems to really drive home why the committee badly wants Cipollone under oath.... if he goes up there and confirms her testimony about him expressing legal concerns to Trump about possible crimes being committed, that would be ballgame. (Or should anyway)

Edited by mtutiger
Posted
7 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

I'm no lawyer, but the hearing seems to really drive home why the committee badly wants Cipollone under oath.... if he goes up there and confirms her testimony about him expressing legal concerns to Trump about possible crimes being committed, that would be ballgame. (Or should anyway)

That guy had better receive a 24/7 detail to protect him.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      288
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...