CMRivdogs Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 Just asking. Since our resident Trump supporter is AWOL I don't expect an answer Quote
1984Echoes Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 2 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: So what does the Special Master do about empty folders? Press charges? Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 2 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: She's a putz Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 (edited) Quote enjoins the Justice Dept from reviewing the seized materials for investigative purposes pending completion of the special master review Ridiculous windmill tilt since they've all already been reviewed. it would be nice to have a legal system in the US that at least still pretends to be attached to reality. Edited September 5, 2022 by gehringer_2 Quote
1984Echoes Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 16 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: She's a putz 14 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: Ridiculous windmill tilt since they've all already been reviewed. it would be nice to have a legal system in the US that at least still pretends to be attached to reality. Which makes her much much worse than a putz. Did Trump pay her off somehow, or threaten her life? That's the first question I ask. Quote
chasfh Posted September 5, 2022 Author Posted September 5, 2022 4 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: Trump sure got his money's worth out of appointing this LILF. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 /..sigh../ This is what happens when Law Schools become profit centers for schools with good reps. Quote
1984Echoes Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 59 minutes ago, chasfh said: Trump sure got his money's worth out of appointing this LILF. BOUGHT and F'ing PAID FOR by Trump. EXACTLY what he wanted. A corrupted judiciary specifically loyal to HIM. Democracy in the U.S. is DEAD and replaced by Trump-centric kleptocracy. Now, if he can only figure out how top force his way back to President (Dictator-for-Life...). Quote
1984Echoes Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 PS: She needs to be impeached. Tomorrow. Immediately. And her judgement tossed out. IMO. Quote
pfife Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 The decision sucks but one thing I did think was a bit suspect was the notion that a special master wasn't needed because the DOJ reviewed already. Isn't the point of special master that a neutral 3rd party should review? I recall this from.... maybe the Mueller investigation (?) and their review process went surprisingly quickly. Quote
Jim Cowan Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 How soon before Marvel introduces a Special Master? Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 2 hours ago, pfife said: The decision sucks but one thing I did think was a bit suspect was the notion that a special master wasn't needed because the DOJ reviewed already. Isn't the point of special master that a neutral 3rd party should review? I recall this from.... maybe the Mueller investigation (?) and their review process went surprisingly quickly. I think the bigger issue with the Special master review is that it's fundamentally irrelevant to the likely charges to be filed; at it's base it's just another delaying tactic. Of course if DOJ would go ahead and file some charges that might all get a lot clearer. Quote
smr-nj Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 2 hours ago, romad1 said: Rubio...jesus. A storage issue. No… Did he say that’s why he took them? smh Quote
romad1 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 3 minutes ago, smr-nj said: No… Did he say that’s why he took them? smh he's disputing the importance of the Espion-a-Largo scandal as it was merely a dispute over document storage. Um, nope. 1 Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 11 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: I think the bigger issue with the Special master review is that it's fundamentally irrelevant to the likely charges to be filed; at it's base it's just another delaying tactic. Of course if DOJ would go ahead and file some charges that might all get a lot clearer. It's purely a nonsensical delay tactic by Trump's legal team. They know their guy is fucked and appointing a Special Master just delays, but does not end, the DOJs investigation and (potential) criminal charges by the DOJ. The Special Master does not change anything in the facts of the case and will not get him off the hook on a thing. Quote
romad1 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 2 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: It's purely a nonsensical delay tactic by Trump's legal team. They know their guy is fucked and appointing a Special Master just delays, but does not end, the DOJs investigation and (potential) criminal charges by the DOJ. The Special Master does not change anything in the facts of the case and will not get him off the hook on a thing. Delay and disrupt. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 It's been the Trump Organization MO for years Quote
ben9753 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 Can someone explain the meaning of Special Master and what it means for Trump and the investigation? I don't read the news much and am off twitter and rely on this board for current events. Quote
oblong Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 the judge wants to appoint someone to review the material to separate out the personal/privilege stuff from the items that belongs to the government. Which is silly because it's already been done! From what I have read the judge basically did the work of the attorneys. Meaning.... they didn't ask for things, didn't clarify things, etc. but the judge just ruled as if they did. Like a teacher filling in test answers or grading an essay not written. Quote
romad1 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 Just now, oblong said: the judge wants to appoint someone to review the material to separate out the personal/privilege stuff from the items that belongs to the government. Which is silly because it's already been done! From what I have read the judge basically did the work of the attorneys. Meaning.... they didn't ask for things, didn't clarify things, etc. but the judge just ruled as if they did. Like a teacher filling in test answers or grading an essay not written. Because if you control the judges having a lawyer plead your case is an unnecessary step. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 1 hour ago, oblong said: the judge wants to appoint someone to review the material to separate out the personal/privilege stuff from the items that belongs to the government. Which is silly because it's already been done! From what I have read the judge basically did the work of the attorneys. Meaning.... they didn't ask for things, didn't clarify things, etc. but the judge just ruled as if they did. Like a teacher filling in test answers or grading an essay not written. The SCOTUS did away with most 'incompetent counsel' appeal grounds so a MAGA judge has little choice if she wants to avoid a ruling against the Orange Menace that he can't appeal. Quote
Tigerbomb13 Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 It’s about as close as he will get to paying someone for their services. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted September 6, 2022 Posted September 6, 2022 I definitely would not accept a broken down horse from that man Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.