Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

 

Two things about that spot:

  1. They should have washed out the color on the Trump clip, if not made it in black and white.
  2. There is a danger that this very spot will motivate Republican voters because their still hero appears in it looking like a normal politician.
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

If Republicans come to the table in 2024 with Trump as their nominee and only having done a bunch of investigations on Biden, his family, Anthony Faucci, etc. they will get wiped out. Short of a catastrophic economic collapse or 9/11 sized tragedy, they will pay a heavy political price for having no agenda and only spending the last 2 years acting like a bunch of goons.

Oh I think I said this exact same thing above...

But... you said it just so much better. More concise and to the point!

Posted
12 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

In reality they used each other. It's been going on since at least Pat Robertson/Jerry Falwell. And probably back to Billy Graham.

 

Yeah...

That was NOT a one-way street.

They willingly sucked up to Trump.

Hard.

Posted
2 hours ago, 1984Echoes said:

Yeah...

That was NOT a one-way street.

They willingly sucked up to Trump.

Hard.

They sure like those judges and Supreme Court Justices he got to appoint though, including I'm sure Mr. Robison whose now suddenly critical of Trump. Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio, our nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

Boebert won. May this be a lesson not to trust partisan wishcasters on Twitter pretending to parse the numbers.

I just assumed she would, was just hoping for a pleasant surprise.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Edman85 said:

Boebert won. May this be a lesson not to trust partisan wishcasters on Twitter pretending to parse the numbers.

If they stopped counting election night she would have lost. Something is fishy in that district 

 

(sarcasm)

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Edman85 said:

Boebert won. May this be a lesson not to trust partisan wishcasters on Twitter pretending to parse the numbers.

I'm not sure many actually predicted her to lose, but those partisan wichcasters got a lot of the election right. 

Posted (edited)

I’ve been surprised by how quiet the noise about “voter fraud” has been, but as we get closer to the moment of truth, the noise is getting steadily louder, and its effect is getting closer to the actual levers of power.

January 3 is going to be a mess.

Edited by chasfh
Posted
24 minutes ago, oblong said:

Why was the runoff in GA in 2020 on January 5, but this year it's Dec 6?  Did they change it or was there another reason?

Georgia changed the law earlier this year to shorten the time between the general and runoff elections. Basically lawmakers felt that the longer time between elections was too exhausting to the candidates and election officials.

 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/georgias-new-voting-law-affects-senate-runoff-rcna57152

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      291
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...