oblong Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 They want to go after birth control next. Then no fault divorce. A bible verse should never be the basis for a judicial or legislative decsion. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 It's going to be something when this ban goes nationwide next year because a bunch of leftists are upset about an overseas war the US didn't start and isn't involved in. Quote
romad1 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 15 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: It's going to be something when this ban goes nationwide next year because a bunch of leftists are upset about an overseas war the US didn't start and isn't involved in. Project 2025 can be stopped in 2024. Quote
mtutiger Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 Yep. And one would think that we could carve out some time between the wall to wall coverage of Biden's age to put them on the spot about it. Quote
chasfh Posted February 22, 2024 Author Posted February 22, 2024 32 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Yep. And one would think that we could carve out some time between the wall to wall coverage of Biden's age to put them on the spot about it. But this is so hard to understand! Alzheimer Biden, though—that's easy. Quote
romad1 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 More of the hypocrites/kleptocrats who want to let the Churchladies run your sexlife but not theirs. New Matt Schlapp Subpoenas Target Document-Shredding at CPAC (yahoo.com) Quote
romad1 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 Next time someone at your water cooler brings up "woke" or anything like it. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 3 hours ago, oblong said: They want to go after birth control next. Then no fault divorce. A bible verse should never be the basis for a judicial or legislative decsion. did you see Alito's latest complaint about a decision where counsel pretty much challenged anyone in a jury pool who had a religious belief that the defendent was sinful? He thought that amounted to society labeling the religious as bigots. Well, Jeez Louise, he only has it completely backwards. If you are going to tell me that you think legal behavior of a defendant is sinful - then your *are* a prejudiced juror! The man can't reason his way out of a paper bag without invoking half a dozen logical fallacies. No-one's religion deserves or can or should be given special status. That just frosts the hell out of *bigots* like Alito (yes it is a *bigot* you see in the mirror every morning Sam) that people challenge their bigotry in the name of the very freedom and constitutional order they want to wrap themselves in while maintaining those prejudices. 1 1 Quote
romad1 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 This might win the internet for today 2 Quote
romad1 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 2 hours ago, romad1 said: This might win the internet for today It would be cool if it ended up with Donald Trump doing a Christine O'Donnell quality ad denying that he's against sex Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 In today's GOP O'Donnell may be one of the more sane ones. Quote
chasfh Posted February 22, 2024 Author Posted February 22, 2024 23 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: Trasnlation: "Well, that's a hard one because I have no idea what the **** you're talking about." Quote
gehringer_2 Posted February 22, 2024 Posted February 22, 2024 2 minutes ago, chasfh said: "I have no idea .." Would be Tuberville's most appropriate campaign slogan. Quote
mtutiger Posted February 23, 2024 Posted February 23, 2024 5 hours ago, chasfh said: Trasnlation: "Well, that's a hard one because I have no idea what the **** you're talking about." And I thought he was an incompetent ball coach... Good Lord Quote
mtutiger Posted February 23, 2024 Posted February 23, 2024 Seeing a lot of these sorts of comments from GOP lawmakers... but they really should not have been shocked. In fact, it was predictable as hell that stuff taken for granted by the general public would eventually be impacted by the decision. What's next, contraception? Quote
mtutiger Posted February 23, 2024 Posted February 23, 2024 Also, do these people just not read or think through the implications of these bills they sign onto? Quote
oblong Posted February 23, 2024 Posted February 23, 2024 34 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Seeing a lot of these sorts of comments from GOP lawmakers... but they really should not have been shocked. In fact, it was predictable as hell that stuff taken for granted by the general public would eventually be impacted by the decision. What's next, contraception? Yes. And I always thought if Haley got the GOP nomination she'd be in a better position than Trump to defeat Biden. But she's taken some strong stances on abortion and I've read she had her children through IVF so this will be an interesting weave for her to work around. It could all backfire spectactularly or she could pick and choose and carefully lay out what is and isn't appropriate. But rulings like this don't help the "Well they won't do that will they?" mantra because... yes they will and yes they have. You can no longer say that about anything once you "leave it to the states". And coming up with a federal restriction/allowance is not "leaving it to the states". Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted February 23, 2024 Posted February 23, 2024 21 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: Just clumps of cells, nothing to see here. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted February 23, 2024 Posted February 23, 2024 Just now, Tigeraholic1 said: Just clumps of cells, nothing to see here. Not in Alabama. They are holding her children hostage. I feel like even Alabama would have laws against that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.