mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 07:57 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 07:57 PM 33 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: This is from that large CES poll that was shared earlier. These are the swing state numbers. Those Georgia and Arizona numbers don't look that strong for Harris. Unless my math is wrong, that would add up to a Harris EC win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edman85 Posted Tuesday at 08:06 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:06 PM 8 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Unless my math is wrong, that would add up to a Harris EC win. Assuming all 270 of her electors are faithful and she gets NE-2, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Just now, Edman85 said: Assuming all 270 of her electors are faithful and she gets NE-2, yes. CES shows her getting 276, not 270 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edman85 Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Just now, mtutiger said: CES shows her getting 276, not 270 Whoops, missed Nevada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM (edited) 10 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Unless my math is wrong, that would add up to a Harris EC win. As is usual, I can see the election being half a loaf. Trump will lose but it will close enough that he won't go away and the GOP will remain in his thrall. So hopefully the courts have the cajones to put him in jail, or he shuffles off this mortal coil before 2028. Edited Tuesday at 08:08 PM by gehringer_2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romad1 Posted Tuesday at 08:10 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:10 PM 32 minutes ago, romad1 said: You work to create the best conditions you can. Create the foundation for lifting as many boats as possible. You can't have bad government in the United States because bad government exists in Afghanistan or Russia. Well said here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 08:12 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:12 PM 2 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: As is usual, I can see the election being half a loaf. Trump will lose but it will close enough that he won't go away and the GOP will remain in his thrall. So hopefully he shuffles off this mortal coil before 2028. I would take a narrow win at this point just for this alone - maybe with him off this mortal coil or too old / incapacitated, maybe it gives both parties an opportunity to regroup and move our politics beyond his BS. If he wins, there'll be none of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 08:15 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:15 PM CES's estimates are based off their demographic crosstabs - they had Trump gaining more with black voters and Harris gaining more with white voters than is likely to happen. I particularly doubt the Georgia numbers.... I'd be surprised if the spread is that high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edman85 Posted Tuesday at 08:18 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:18 PM https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/10/29/poll-close-times/ Good summary of close times within. If it's close at all, we likely won't know Tuesday night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted Tuesday at 08:29 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:29 PM 1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said: We are seeing one of two things: a) the dems are flooding the market with bad data designed to counter the GOP bad data, or b)results are filtering in that says the national polling models have been wrong. Take your choice until Tues night when you can cash in or lose your money! 😱 (c) the national polling models are correct and it's going to be a really close election with no clear winner. (d) the national models are wrong in the same way they were in 2016 and 2020 and Trump is going to win. At any rate, MTB flooding the forum with sunshine results for the Democrats does not increase my confidence in Harris winning. My default predicton is that Harrs will win a close race bcause Americans can't be that dumb, but they've disappointed me before! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.TaterSalad Posted Tuesday at 08:31 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:31 PM 33 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Unless my math is wrong, that would add up to a Harris EC win. No it's right, but I'd like to have more of a cushion (no pun) than that incase a state, like Pennsylvania, doesn't break our way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted Tuesday at 08:33 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:33 PM What CES is saying is exactly what I'm hoping for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.TaterSalad Posted Tuesday at 08:33 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:33 PM 3 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: (c) the national polling models are correct and it's going to be a really close election with no clear winner. (d) the national models are wrong in the same way they were in 2016 and 2020 and Trump is going to win. At any rate, MTB flooding the forum with sunshine results for the Democrats does not increase my confidence in Harris winning. My default predicton is that Harrs will win a close race bcause Americans can't be that dumb, but they've disappointed me before! This is largely how I feel as well. I think she'll win by a hair with the blue wall states and maybe one other. I think the popular vote will be tighter as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motown Bombers Posted Tuesday at 08:34 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:34 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted Tuesday at 08:36 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:36 PM 17 minutes ago, Edman85 said: https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/10/29/poll-close-times/ Good summary of close times within. If it's close at all, we likely won't know Tuesday night. I am expecting a **** show as bad as 2020. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 08:39 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:39 PM (edited) 10 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: (d) the national models are wrong in the same way they were in 2016 and 2020 and Trump is going to win. Isn't there an (e) option that involves pollsters overcorrecting? I honestly don't know what is going on, but I do think that people are too dismissive of the idea that pollsters are trying things to increase accuracy from previous elections and that we ultimately won't know whether it works or not until after this thing happens. Edited Tuesday at 08:40 PM by mtutiger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 08:41 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:41 PM 7 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: What CES is saying is exactly what I'm hoping for. I think it will be close too... my only real hot take is that she has more upside in Georgia than the polls are showing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motown Bombers Posted Tuesday at 08:42 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:42 PM I think the republican vote for Harris is being underestimated. Her campaign put in a lot of work to convert those voters and get them to the polls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted Tuesday at 08:49 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:49 PM 8 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Isn't there an (e) option that involves pollsters overcorrecting? I honestly don't know what is going on, but I do think that people are too dismissive of the idea that pollsters are trying things to increase accuracy from previous elections and that we ultimately won't know whether it works or not until after this thing happens. Yes, that is an option, but I thought that was one of Gehringer's choices. I may have misread it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaceyLou Posted Tuesday at 08:50 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:50 PM 2 hours ago, Motown Bombers said: Perhaps one reason Drumpf and company wanted people to vote early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 08:53 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:53 PM The fact that this wasn't 9-0 is ridiculous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motown Bombers Posted Tuesday at 08:56 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:56 PM I’m surprised the dissenting opinion wasn’t Thomas or Alito. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted Tuesday at 09:00 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:00 PM Gorsuch is an odd duck. He’d vote to seal his own death if he found some obscure writing somewhere in a libertarian journal to support it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motor City Sonics Posted Tuesday at 09:04 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:04 PM Well I did my part today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted Tuesday at 09:05 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:05 PM I don’t think anybody knows anything with regard to EV numbers. There’s very little precedent to justify assumptions being made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.