Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

538 called them the most accurate pollster of 2020 though. There's something to that no?

They landed numbers in 2020 relatively accurately, but their methodology is suspect. And they have had a lot of issues in their own backyard (ie. Sao Paolo)

I'll take my chances with J. Ann Selzer over those guys. I'd say the same thing if Selzer gave us a Trump +15 poll

Posted (edited)

For what it's worth, Harris pulled ahead on Polymarket.  I think Trump was up by about 15% a couple of days ago.  Apparently that multi-millionaire in France put most of his cash on Trump and can't get out of it.  That's a shame.  

Edited by Tiger337
Posted
13 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

"Wrong again?" Selzer is usually dead nuts on as if she has access to early voting totals.

Even beyond her, I think the fact that the Trump Leadership Team needed to issue a memo about this poll is such a red flag to me.

They know stuff that we aren't seeing. It's been obvious for a little while now.

Posted
1 hour ago, 1776 said:

I hope, in a big way, a winner is declared very shortly after Tuesday. It would be great to have a winner by midnight Tuesday but I’m not banking on that. If this thing drags out…
 

Harris is more likely to win a quickly decided election, IMO.

I only say that because it is looking like Arizona, Nevada, and Alaska are all going to take days to finalize. And those are states Trump needs.

Posted

Even though I always regret going to 'twitter,' I couldn't resist looking at it to see reaction to the Selzer poll. 

Did you know that it means she has sold out, and that this is part of massive election fraud, or at least an attempt to throw Drumpf off of his game? 

You learn something new every day.

Posted
10 hours ago, mtutiger said:

I drove past two farms in rural Kankakee/Will County IL earlier today with big Harris-Walz displays...

It's not epochal or anything, but something is going on.... people are willing to put it out there, stick their neck out in a way they didn't previously.

I too was surprised that I saw as many Harris Walz signs as I have in rural states that Trump already has sown up. Not as many as Trump, of course, but in the places where I saw them, I would think it would rile the neighbors.

Posted
7 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

Was that the real Tim Kaine on SNL? 

I saw a Kaine for Senate spot while I was in Bristol, TNVA, so he's got some skin in the game. Couldn't hurt Kamala in VA to have him on the show, either.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

Was that the real Tim Kaine on SNL? 

The remember the names bit was great. Good spoof of online culture warriors.

Edited by Edman85
  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, VegasTiger said:

Lol, proving the premise.

I forgot his name too.  
 

In 2016 the episode before the election had the famous Trump voter black jeopardy sketch.  Tom Hanks played Doug. I got the same vibes.  

Posted

Kamala did fine and her performance will be indicative of why she will win, if she does. Just the smile itself. It didn’t come across as politician fake. It’s refreshing.  People are tired of Trump and his negativity. 

Posted
8 hours ago, LaceyLou said:

Not sure how I missed it... did Drumpf really say that the job of auto workers was an easy one that could be done by a child? 

Well   A - that should be plastered in ads all over the telly in these last 2 days

B - He'll probably roll back child labor laws if given the chance like that troll in Arkansas did. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...