Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election thread


pfife

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

So, apparently Trump has officially announced that he is going to eliminate the Department of Education.  It's not surprising that a President who can't read or speak beyond a third grade level would want to eliminate a department with the word "education" in it.  

They'll privatize the schools. More cronies to make a buck and cost the little guy $$$. When America was allegedly great (after WWII thru the 50s, 60, 70s, according to the Trumpers) the reality was if you didn't like what the local systems taught you actually paid for the education. Once the schools were desecrated these folks pushed for government supported alternatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Agreed, but I stand behind what I said. Three votes isn't a lot, particularly given there are going to be at least 1-2 vacancies (Stefanik + possible other or others)

I think anything dealing with something like tax cuts will go through.  I can see where something like eliminating the Dept will be viewed as unnecessary and not necessarily beneficial to their constiuents.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Agreed, but I stand behind what I said. Three votes isn't a lot, particularly given there are going to be at least 1-2 vacancies (Stefanik + possible other or others)

The count is currently 222 if they stopped the count now. Not sure if there's blue waves in California mail votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

The count is currently 222 if they stopped the count now. Not sure if there's blue waves in California mail votes.

There's 1-2 seats in California that could (perhaps even will) flip based on the behavior of late arriving mail.

My point still stands at 222 though.... I understand that the behavior of the members continues to get worse, but the margins are still incredibly thin. Particularly given that, unless the filibuster is abolished, it's DOA in the Senate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

There's 1-2 seats in California that could (perhaps even will) flip based on the behavior of late arriving mail.

My point still stands at 222 though.... I understand that the behavior of the members continues to get worse, but the margins are still incredibly thin. Particularly given that, unless the filibuster is abolished, it's DOA in the Senate.

I can see them nuking the filibuster if it means Trump gets what he wants. And in the Senate, we've lost the Corker's, Romney's, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I think anything dealing with something like tax cuts will go through.  I can see where something like eliminating the Dept will be viewed as unnecessary and not necessarily beneficial to their constiuents.  

I don't believe they could use the reconciliation process to eliminate an entire federal department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

I don't believe they could use the reconciliation process to eliminate an entire federal department. 

I've dealt with 6 years of a legislature rubber stamping whatever cockamamie thing Ronny D wants regardless of precedent. I have a bad feeling they will just find a way and change the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

I've dealt with 6 years of a legislature rubber stamping whatever cockamamie thing Ronny D wants regardless of precedent. I have a bad feeling they will just find a way and change the rules.

The margins in the Florida House and Senate are significantly larger than the 119th Congress will be. And have been ever since Ronny D showed up in Tallahassee.

If we were talking about a 20 seat majority, I'd be singing a different tune... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

So, apparently Trump has officially announced that he is going to eliminate the Department of Education.  It's not surprising that a President who can't read or speak beyond a third grade level would want to eliminate a department with the word "education" in it.  

the existence of the dept of Education is simply an org chart choice. The real question is what happens to the legislation that directs the department's current mandates? Before there was a department of Education there was a division within the former Dept or Health, Education and Welfare (HEW). The president can reduce his cabinet by one chair (assuming he gets Congress to go along  - TBH, 15 direct reports is a large number for any admin) but the rubber meets the road at what Congress does with all of DOE's current tasks. If they just all get moved into another administrative unit inside say, HHS, then not much changes. It's not like any one knows who the Secretary of Education is or he/she has any great pull in inside the executive branch now.

Just for context, the nation managed to educate the largest cohort in his history before DOE existed (est 1979).

This is actually the kind of thing I hope Trump spends all his time on. Stuff that is red meat to the base but in basically re-arranging deck chairs. Improves the odds he'll have less ambition to screw up important stuff.

 

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

They'll privatize the schools. More cronies to make a buck and cost the little guy $$$.

Who do you think is paying the tab on the $240 billion 2024 budget for the boondoggle DOE? It’s the little guy. How much say does the little guy have in deciding where that money is spent?

There is a gentleman that oversees a private school system that is between 6,000-7,000 students the last I checked. This gentleman made his money in business and was very successful prior to founding these schools. In the past two years he opened one of his schools in the Wake Forest area. He did this in an existing building that a communications company moved out of due to competition in their industry. 
The attendance at this particular school is in the hundreds. Unless something changed very recently, this school is tuition free. The school had to turn parents away because it was immediately filled as soon as news was out before the doors actually opened. 
Need more of these stories.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 1776 said:

President-elect Donald Trump is selecting former congressman Lee Zeldin (R., N.Y.) to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, a role with considerable influence over the incoming administration’s energy and regulatory agenda.

Wonderful choice to head the EPA. 

IMG_4458.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, 1776 said:

Who do you think is paying the tab on the $240 billion 2024 budget for the boondoggle DOE? It’s the little guy. How much say does the little guy have in deciding where that money is spent?

There is a gentleman that oversees a private school system that is between 6,000-7,000 students the last I checked. This gentleman made his money in business and was very successful prior to founding these schools. In the past two years he opened one of his schools in the Wake Forest area. He did this in an existing building that a communications company moved out of due to competition in their industry. 
The attendance at this particular school is in the hundreds. Unless something changed very recently, this school is tuition free. The school had to turn parents away because it was immediately filled as soon as news was out before the doors actually opened. 
Need more of these stories.

 

Schools that get to select their students do well. 
 

one reason public schools always score worse than private is because they have to take every student.  Many students have disabilities across the board along with language barriers and horrible home lives.  Many are homeless. It might surprise you to find out they don’t do as well.  They also cost more to take care of. So when you callously speak about bloated budgets you should understand what much of that money goes to. It’s not an apples to apples comparison.  60-70 years ago these kids were discarded and thrown into institutions and forgotten about. You know…back in the “good old days”.   It takes a special kind of cruelty to ignore our most vulnerable kids and citizens but with today’s GOP that’s ultimately the point isn’t it?  

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oblong said:

Schools that get to select their students do well. 
 

one reason public schools always score worse than private is because they have to take every student.  Many students have disabilities across the board along with language barriers and horrible home lives.  Many are homeless. It might surprise you to find out they don’t do as well.  They also cost more to take care of. So when you callously speak about bloated budgets you should understand what much of that money goes to. It’s not an apples to apples comparison.  60-70 years ago these kids were discarded and thrown into institutions and forgotten about. You know…back in the “good old days”.   It takes a special kind of cruelty to ignore our most vulnerable kids and citizens but with today’s GOP that’s ultimately the point isn’t it?  

How do people not understand this?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...