Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Hongbit said:

AI is great for content ideas and a base for starting something but folks need to stop cut and paste posting straight from ChatGPT.  Take a second and tweak it and make it sound more like their voice (also use the make it shorter command a few times too).

 

But that would be work, and that's simply a bridge too far.

Posted
1 minute ago, Screwball said:

No, I used a computer and excel. 😉

Until AI gets something like this right, it simply has limited utility for me.

Posted

ChatGPT pushed a new image creation update to the free version.  

I just asked for an image of a man and woman eating at a restaurant.  Casual and romantic.

Not perfect.  But not bad for someone who has no clue what he is doing and for only one attempt.  The food is uninspiring, but you could run it again with more directions to fix that. A restaurant could run a social media campaign using this with no problem.

PUFU1Lk.png

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Deleterious said:

ChatGPT pushed a new image creation update to the free version.  

I just asked for an image of a man and woman eating at a restaurant.  Casual and romantic.

Not perfect.  But not bad for someone who has no clue what he is doing and for only one attempt.  The food is uninspiring, but you could run it again with more directions to fix that. A restaurant could run a social media campaign using this with no problem.

PUFU1Lk.png

 

*he* looks like he's had a nose job. :classic_laugh:

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted

The past couple of weeks we've been experiencing pollen season. This year seem particularly bad to me (maybe it's my lungs). Between waking up to a car and outdoor furniture covered in the ugly yellow/green stuff along with the added joy of local birds adding their own signatures.

At least we're keeping the local car wash busy 

Posted
On 3/28/2025 at 11:42 AM, chasfh said:

Can I just tell you how completely underwhelmed I continue to be by AI and its capabilities?

I have a standing test for AI to see whether I feel I can use it reliably and trust its accuracy, and it's this: I have a softball league of eight teams. We play a seven-game season, with games times at 6pm, 7pm, 8pm, and 9pm. Devise a seven-week schedule in which each team plays every other team once and only once, and every team plays no more than two games maximum scheduled for any one game time throughout the season. It's a simple math/logic test.

None of the AIs I've used can do this. Some of them will schedule one team against another four times while not even playing three other teams at all. And some teams will have five games scheduled for a particular time and no games scheduled for one or two others. If you tell me I am giving it an impossible task, that's fine, but before I accept that, you'll have to tell me exactly why it's impossible.

Now here's a new example of uselessness: I used Microsoft Word to develop  a set of questions for something my wife and I are exploring in which I mixed first person singular with first person plural. They should all be first person plural. Microsoft Word has their Copilot AI built into their 365 package. So I asked Copilot within Word: "change all first person singular to first person plural".

This was its reply: "It looks like you want to change all first-person singular pronouns to first-person plural pronouns in your document. Unfortunately, I can't make changes to your document directly. However, I can help you with other tasks such as summarizing documents, generating content, or answering questions. Would you like me to assist you with anything else? 😊"

Oh, come ON! Seriously? You really can't do even that?

I've never wanted to punch a smarmy useless smiley emoji in the face quite so much as when I saw this.

I have a colleague who seems to think we can use AI to do everything to make our jobs easier. I can't get into specifics, but I'm 100% out on it. Don't get me wrong. I love writing code to make our jobs easier, but the code needs to be fully vetted and well-planned out, not at the whims of an algorithm.

Posted
12 hours ago, Edman85 said:

I have a colleague who seems to think we can use AI to do everything to make our jobs easier. I can't get into specifics, but I'm 100% out on it. Don't get me wrong. I love writing code to make our jobs easier, but the code needs to be fully vetted and well-planned out, not at the whims of an algorithm.

When Alan Mulally left Boeing and went to Ford, got push back from one of the VP's there implying he didn't understand the challenge of quality issues.. "Look, our cars have thousands of parts, if they don't work it breaks down"  

"That's nice.  At Boeing our airplanes have millions of parts and if they don't work they fall out of the sky and people die"

Posted

Blue Origin launched an "all female crew" including some celebritiess and I'm seeing all kinds of emotional reactions and talk of "trailblazing".  Sorry... I'm going to nerd out and say this is not something special.  These are not astronauts. This is not a "crew".  They are passengers going up for a flight that is less than what Alan Shepard did in 1961.  He was up for 15 minutes they are up for 11.  They are going up 2 miles short of the Karman line (62 miles) which is considered "space".

So yeah... it's cool what they are doing but let's not overstate this as something more than it is.  It's rich and connected woman paying for a PR stunt.  If I had the money i'd do it in a heartbeat.  It's a combo bungee jump/zipline experience.

Posted
On 4/9/2025 at 8:23 AM, oblong said:

When Alan Mulally left Boeing and went to Ford, got push back from one of the VP's there implying he didn't understand the challenge of quality issues.. "Look, our cars have thousands of parts, if they don't work it breaks down"  

"That's nice.  At Boeing our airplanes have millions of parts and if they don't work they fall out of the sky and people die"

Mulally was the best thing to happen to FoMoCo in a long time - maybe since Peterson. Still, to give them their due, the engineering for automobiles is still challenging, it's just different. In Aero, you have to design for ultimate reliability, but also have the luxury of designing where you can rely on regularly scheduled maintenance and troubleshooting. In auto, you have to make things that survive all kinds of abuse, mud, dirt roads, burrowing animals, being ignored literally for years, and have accountants over your shoulder shaving your costs down to the decimal places of pennies.

Posted

Our automobiles are a design nightmare for various reasons. What idiot decided it was a good idea to put a fuel pump inside a gas tank? Or a starter underneath an intake manifold? And then when they don't know how to fix their poorly designed POS they give you this bunch of hot BS like this;

truck_temp.jpg.f4f5325d05c9b6477810bb35a82a7c34.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, Screwball said:

What idiot decided it was a good idea to put a fuel pump inside a gas tank?

LOL - yup - we go back to cam shaft driven diaphragm suction pumps pulling fuel out of the tank. Run into something hard enough to stop the engine and the fuel pump stops. The ideal fail safe.

I spent most of my work life around electrical systems designed for explosive atmospheres, but still amazed they did it in a car.

Posted
On 4/14/2025 at 10:50 AM, Screwball said:

Our automobiles are a design nightmare for various reasons. What idiot decided it was a good idea to put a fuel pump inside a gas tank? Or a starter underneath an intake manifold? And then when they don't know how to fix their poorly designed POS they give you this bunch of hot BS like this;

truck_temp.jpg.f4f5325d05c9b6477810bb35a82a7c34.jpg

tiny GIF

Posted
13 minutes ago, Shades of Deivi Cruz said:

tiny GIF

This is a known problem for this model as shown by the date on top. Highlighted in yellow is;

Condition - temperature gauge fluctuates at idle or driving.

Cause - condition deemed normal by engineering at this time.

 

Normal my ass. They don't know how to fix it and it's been to two different dealerships.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Screwball said:

This is a known problem for this model as shown by the date on top. Highlighted in yellow is;

Condition - temperature gauge fluctuates at idle or driving.

Cause - condition deemed normal by engineering at this time.

 

Normal my ass. They don't know how to fix it and it's been to two different dealerships.

It certainly seems like if the vehicle isn't actively triggering an alert/problem in the diagnostic software they use, they are going to say there is no problem. There have been a couple of things that we have noticed with our Honda Pilot that we mentioned to the dealer on multiple occasions. One was that it would stall out sometimes when you were stopped and the auto-engine idle was engaged. It happened so often that we asked them to go into the system and turn the feature off. They were confused as to why we would ask that, since there wasn't a "problem being reported". 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...