Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I wouldn't be so sure.  She is not very bright.  

She could not pass a citizenship test.      And I think she is probably only familiar with 2 constitutional amendments. 1 and 2.    Something tells me that she'll be very familiar with 5 before we're done hearing from her.  

Posted
4 hours ago, Motor City Sonics said:

She could not pass a citizenship test.      And I think she is probably only familiar with 2 constitutional amendments. 1 and 2.    Something tells me that she'll be very familiar with 5 before we're done hearing from her.  

I suspect only parts of the 1st at that.

Posted
On 2/20/2023 at 6:23 PM, Motor City Sonics said:

She could not pass a citizenship test.      And I think she is probably only familiar with 2 constitutional amendments. 1 and 2.    Something tells me that she'll be very familiar with 5 before we're done hearing from her.  

 

Tomorrow she's going to say that people should be required to draw and quarter troops, and that those people should be subject to search and seizure without a warrant when being tried for that crime, and that those people can self-incriminate themselves in court, found guilty without a jury, also sued without a jury, given a tortuous penalty by another state.

Posted
11 hours ago, Edman85 said:

 

Tomorrow she's going to say that people should be required to draw and quarter troops, and that those people should be subject to search and seizure without a warrant when being tried for that crime, and that those people can self-incriminate themselves in court, found guilty without a jury, also sued without a jury, given a tortuous penalty by another state.

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47pms54ys00b4g6rg678

Posted
12 hours ago, Edman85 said:

 

Tomorrow she's going to say that people should be required to draw and quarter troops, and that those people should be subject to search and seizure without a warrant when being tried for that crime, and that those people can self-incriminate themselves in court, found guilty without a jury, also sued without a jury, given a tortuous penalty by another state.

Not quite, but I did see something about banning citizens who moved from blue states to red states from voting for five years.....

.

Posted
1 hour ago, romad1 said:

If this means that members of congress from "red states" can't vote in the District of Columbia for 5 years that would be problematic.  

Actually that would fix a lot of problems...

Posted
19 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

 

Note how Hawley says he wants it at $25 so they add credibility to their future claim to the American people they forced a corrupt Democrat pharma company to act in the interests of America’s heartland voters.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

You want George Santos to run with Biden?

He read about America's favorite big bootys in the official training documents in the American willage

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      291
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...