Jump to content

2022-23 Detroit Tigers Offseason Thread


chasfh

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, HeyAbbott said:

We probably  6 or 7 top line guys to compete for a divisional championship in the AL Central. To get a sure thing first string player today one is looking at an eight year commitment at 20 mil per season per player minimum. We would need a 140 million dollar per year increase in the payroll per year committed  per year for the next 8 years or an additional 1.2 billion dollar payroll commitment additional to cover the next 8 years. Or in other words, for 280 to 300 million a year, assuming no injuries and no screw-ups choosing your free agent signings, you get maybe 3 or 4 shots at the crap-shoot known as the World Series. That's probably where the free agent market is today.

This post is correct, although the highlighted number could be lower depending on advances by guys like Torkelson/Greene/Meadows, etc. Which also speaks to the fact that, as much as people may roll their eyes at pinning hopes on those already on the roster, in order for them to be even have a chance at being remotely competitive or even sniffing .500 in 2023, more than anything else that is what will make up the difference. Not any one individual free agent signing.

Edited by mtutiger
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RatkoVarda said:

Yes.

Out of 8 billion people on the planet, there are at most 15 better shortstops.

If Baez leaves, the 2024 SS will probably be a downgrade.

It would be a downgrade at shortstop for 2024, but perhaps the money saved is used for an upgrade elsewhere.  Hopefully, he has a good first half and they can get something for him before he leaves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

It would be a downgrade at shortstop for 2024, but perhaps the money saved is used for an upgrade elsewhere.  Hopefully, he has a good first half and they can get something for him before he leaves.  

I think that this is correct.  It's like comparing whoever plays third for $800,000 to Candelario, without knowing where they spent the money that was saved there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jim Cowan said:

I think that this is correct.  It's like comparing whoever plays third for $800,000 to Candelario, without knowing where they spent the money that was saved there.

It went to the new lights.  Maybe now the hitters can see what they are swinging at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

It would be a downgrade at shortstop for 2024, but perhaps the money saved is used for an upgrade elsewhere.  Hopefully, he has a good first half and they can get something for him before he leaves.  

Really, if both ERod and Javy opt out, added to Miggy coming off the books, they have zero excuse not to spend next offseason.

That's, like, $75 million dollars lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mtutiger said:

Really, if both ERod and Javy opt out, added to Miggy coming off the books, they have zero excuse not to spend next offseason.

That's, like, $75 million dollars lol

Precisely. 

If the younger hitters can rebound/mature, if the pitchers can stay healthy, if they can polish up a high level minor leaguer or 3 that could be ready for 2024.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RatkoVarda said:

Yes.

Out of 8 billion people on the planet, there are at most 15 better shortstops.

If Baez leaves, the 2024 SS will probably be a downgrade.

I agree with this. Hopefully Harris is targeting this right now. Our shelves internally are empty apart from Kriedler who can field but unknown if he can hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Really, if both ERod and Javy opt out, added to Miggy coming off the books, they have zero excuse not to spend next offseason.

That's, like, $75 million dollars lol

The free agent market next year stinks apart from Ohtani who will be a Met for 500 million over 12 years. . He will speed past 400. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SoCalTiger said:

The free agent market next year stinks apart from Ohtani who will be a Met for 500 million over 12 years. . He will speed past 400. 

yep; slightly bigger middle class, but not good overall

C - no one

1b - Rhys Hoskins (31)

2b - Wong (33)

SS - Javier Baez (31); Amed Rosario (28)

3b - Matt Chapman (31); Rafael Devers (27); Machado (31)

LF - Lourdes Gurriel Jr. (30); Ian Happ (29); Jesse Winker (30)

CF - Harrison Bader (30); Cody Bellinger (28)

RF - Teoscar Hernandez (31); Hunter Renfroe (32)

Superstar: Shohei Ohtani (29)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chasfh said:

Correa would never have signed with Detroit for 10/325. He wanted to play for a contender, and despite our playing .475 ball a couple years ago, we weren't one. I think it probably would have taken something close to 400 million for him to throw all that aside and come to Detroit.

San Francisco played .500 ball and are way behind SD and LA.  They also lost out on other free agents this offseason. 

Correa followed the money. And if a better offer came from Detroit, he’d have signed with us.

Thank God we “missed out.”  SF made a horrible deal that they will likely start to regret in 7-8 years, if not sooner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

San Francisco played .500 ball and are way behind SD and LA.  They also lost out on other free agents this offseason. 

Correa followed the money. And if a better offer came from Detroit, he’d have signed with us.

Thank God we “missed out.”  SF made a horrible deal that they will likely start to regret in 7-8 years, if not sooner.

 

Depends. What you say “better offer”, what number would Detroit have had to offer to lead Correa to take ours versus San Francisco’s 13/350?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With payrolls going up and seemingly going to continue to rise I don't think big market teams are as concerned about "regretting" deals 6 or 7 years down the road.

For instance by that time its very likely SF may have near a 300 million dollar payroll if they keep projecting upwards and even if Correa is an albatross by then he would still only represent like 10% of their payroll.

Having that percentage of dead weight isn't nearly as debilitating as say having 30 million on a 150 million like we were with Miggy. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many teams are ignoring the luxury tax, or did that change enough in the latest CBA that it has no teeth? I thought that the Dodgers were the only club that didn’t pay attention to the tax due to the enormous revenues. And the other high payroll teams at least made attempts to stay below some of the time and limit the tax. Some of the recent splurges..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RandyMarsh said:

With payrolls going up and seemingly going to continue to rise I don't think big market teams are as concerned about "regretting" deals 6 or 7 years down the road.

For instance by that time its very likely SF may have near a 300 million dollar payroll if they keep projecting upwards and even if Correa is an albatross by then he would still only represent like 10% of their payroll.

Having that percentage of dead weight isn't nearly as debilitating as say having 30 million on a 150 million like we were with Miggy. 

A number of the big market teams, such as the New York Yankees, have their own cable network they own/control. With the somewhat disappointing ratings for the World Series, MLB could be in danger of the revenue topping out while the revenue for New York and Los Angeles continuing to grow, creating a system where there is a dominant team say Ala The Harlem Globetrotters playing some twenty odd Washington Generals mutant teams instead of true competition. We are not there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tenacious D said:

San Francisco played .500 ball and are way behind SD and LA.  They also lost out on other free agents this offseason. 

Correa followed the money. And if a better offer came from Detroit, he’d have signed with us.

Thank God we “missed out.”  SF made a horrible deal that they will likely start to regret in 7-8 years, if not sooner.

 

He wanted to play for a contender, which is why he left the Astros.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...