Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, 1984Echoes said:

The first 4 guys look like monsters next year (if they all hold up) so we may get ourselves the choice of 2 premium guys that fall to #3...

Source please? (Would like to see the list you’re referencing)

Posted (edited)

(Dylan Crews OF, Jacob Gonzalez SS, Max Clark OF, Chase Dollander RH SP).

So we won't be forced into taking a pitcher at #3, but "should" have a choice.

 

 

 

 

Edited by 1984Echoes
Posted
1 hour ago, 1984Echoes said:

(Dylan Crews OF, Jacob Gonzalez SS, Max Clark OF, Chase Dollander RH SP).

So we won't be forced into taking a pitcher at #3, but "should" have a choice.

 

 

 

 

Stay away from Chasing Dollanders.  

Posted
45 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

Sounds like he's currently on the fence...

I love his answer about building a team for the ballpark.  A smart team should be able to take advantage of an asymmetric park.  I don't get the stuff about the park not being "fair" to hitters.  It's not a terrible park for hitters,  It's below average home run park, but it's pretty close to neutral for run scoring.  The obsession with the long ball is hurting the game.    

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Cruzer1 said:

Baseball America has the Tigers taking Florida outfielder Wyatt Langford with the third pick.

Average speed with an arm that won't play RF so most likely ends up in Left.

No thanks. I believe there's better sitting for us at #3...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I love his answer about building a team for the ballpark.  A smart team should be able to take advantage of an asymmetric park.  I don't get the stuff about the park not being "fair" to hitters.  It's not a terrible park for hitters,  It's below average home run park, but it's pretty close to neutral for run scoring.  The obsession with the long ball is hurting the game.    

and the thing is, with the shift banned,  LHH will be free to put even more emphasis on pulling the ball, and the park is plenty HR friendly to LHH pull hitters.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I love his answer about building a team for the ballpark.  A smart team should be able to take advantage of an asymmetric park.  I don't get the stuff about the park not being "fair" to hitters.  It's not a terrible park for hitters,  It's below average home run park, but it's pretty close to neutral for run scoring.  The obsession with the long ball is hurting the game.    

Especially with the supposed change in the ball.

As an aside, have you seen this story....3 different balls were supposedly used last season

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/study-shows-mlb-used-three-different-baseballs-in-2022-after-admitting-two-were-used-last-season

Posted
4 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

and the thing is, with the shift banned,  LHH will be free to put even more emphasis on pulling the ball, and the park is plenty HR friendly to LHH pull hitters.

Another thing which I think is going to be an even bigger deal than banning the shift is the pitch clock.  Having less time to rest between pitches will likely hurt pitchers significantly.

Posted
1 minute ago, Tiger337 said:

Another thing which I think is going to be an even bigger deal than banning the shift is the pitch clock.  Having less time to rest between pitches will likely hurt pitchers significantly.

This is purely out-of-left-field speculation, but it also makes me wonder if working faster if going to sort of naturally push them away from max-effort-on-every-pitch. It would be ironic if after all the decades of calling for a pitch clock, another benefit of finally having one turns out to be that it's good for pitchers' health. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

This is purely out-of-left-field speculation, but it also makes me wonder if working faster if going to sort of naturally push them away from max-effort-on-every-pitch. It would be ironic if after all the decades of calling for a pitch clock, another benefit of finally having one turns out to be that it's good for pitchers' health. 

That was what I was thinking.  I would have to think that less time between pitches would force them to get away from max effort on every pitch.  Either that or throw even fewer innings.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...