Jump to content

2023 NFL Draft Thread


Mr.TaterSalad

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

If Robinson is Edgerrin James, I take him 6th. 

 

I'd be fine with taking Bijan at 6. Not that he is for sure going to get to his level but he reminds me alot of Marshall Faulk and somebody who I think could really transform the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:

Well Bijan just posted a 4.47 and 4.48 40 time. Not blazing fast but considering his size it is impressive not to mention all the other things he does well is what makes him special. 

does sort of blow up the Edgerrin James comp a bit though.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:

Well Bijan just posted a 4.47 and 4.48 40 time. Not blazing fast but considering his size it is impressive not to mention all the other things he does well is what makes him special. 

What that also says is that he and his camp won't be able to talk themselves into a top 6 selection... they'll be weighed down in comparison to all the other crazy athletes and their crazy numbers...

He might still go top 10... but now there would seem to be a greater chance that he could drift to #18.

That also says... with the Panthers hot for trading up, that if we're in the right spot for a Panthers trade, and Holmes would rather take a big Panthers trade package than select, Murphy for example at #6... then selecting at #9 probably gets him his pick of the top CB that he's interested in...

But I'm just speculatin'...

And I still want Gonzalez over all the other CB's... He's my #1 guy there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be disappointed if they drafted any RB in the first round.    It’s the least valued position in the league and there are ton of options in both the later rounds as well as many proven backs in free agency.    This would be a luxury pick and they still have multiple needs that are more scarce and harder to find than RB.   First round picks are especially important assets for a franchise that hasn’t been to the playoffs for 6 years.  They need to be able to maximize the value of these and I don’t think taking a RB would do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i hate the idea of drafting a rb in the first round, BUT if there are only X amount of elite players in the draft and bijan is one of them, then maybe you do take him at 18?  if he's mccaffery only healthy...well...

this team played so much better when swift was available and healthy.  if robinson can give you that?  maybe you pull the trigger at 18?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jason_R said:

I’d be happy with 18, concerned at 6. 

But I’m not convinced of the value of anyone likely to be there at 6.

We just need...

The Raiders, Falcons & Panthers to be convinced of the value of Will Levis at #6 so there ends up being a bidding war for the rights to draft him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1984Echoes said:

We just need...

The Raiders, Falcons & Panthers to be convinced of the value of Will Levis at #6 so there ends up being a bidding war for the rights to draft him...

the odds are 50/50 that ALL of the 4 qbs will be gone by 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hongbit said:

I’d be disappointed if they drafted any RB in the first round.    It’s the least valued position in the league and there are ton of options in both the later rounds as well as many proven backs in free agency.    This would be a luxury pick and they still have multiple needs that are more scarce and harder to find than RB.   First round picks are especially important assets for a franchise that hasn’t been to the playoffs for 6 years.  They need to be able to maximize the value of these and I don’t think taking a RB would do that. 

 

3 hours ago, buddha said:

i hate the idea of drafting a rb in the first round, BUT if there are only X amount of elite players in the draft and bijan is one of them, then maybe you do take him at 18?  if he's mccaffery only healthy...well...

this team played so much better when swift was available and healthy.  if robinson can give you that?  maybe you pull the trigger at 18?

The thing about Bijan Robinson is that he's more than your typical back. He sounds like an Alvin Kamara (in his prime... without the assaults...), that can run through between the tackles on first down and gain seven yards, and then motion to the slot and run a fly route for 40 yards on 2nd down. He's both the best runner and receiver in the draft.

If there were clear better options, or if we only had the one first round pick, I think I would stay away too. But sometimes the "luxury" pick is what can put you over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Itll end up being the 4 qbs and Will Anderson which would be the worst outcome in my eyes since we lost out on a trade back with no qbs and out on the guy by most accounts seems to be in a tier above the other defenders now that Carter is going through his thing. 

If that were to happen then that's when Im ok with going with guys like Bijan, Johnston or even the top onlinemen and then get your corner at 18. This of course is assuming that Holmes doesnt have a defacto number 1 DB in mind in which case probably need to take him there and not risk losing out on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MichiganCardinal said:

 

The thing about Bijan Robinson is that he's more than your typical back. He sounds like an Alvin Kamara (in his prime... without the assaults...), that can run through between the tackles on first down and gain seven yards, and then motion to the slot and run a fly route for 40 yards on 2nd down. He's both the best runner and receiver in the draft.

If there were clear better options, or if we only had the one first round pick, I think I would stay away too. But sometimes the "luxury" pick is what can put you over the top.

I’d love to add the next Alvin Kamara to this offense.   I want them to find him in the 3rd round just like the Saints did with Kamara.   These guys are so fragile and the shelf life is short that it adds to the risk of taking one so high.  Even if they don’t bust, the durability on almost all of them is so low.   Barkley and CMC are great players taken top 10 but both have been injured and played in less than 75% of games which is less reliable than Swift, who you guys already complain about missing too many games.   

In today’s NFL, I’m not so sure it’s even a good idea to ever sign a RB to a 2nd contract.    The fall off is so quick along with damage that it seems best to draft them outside the first and keep changing out every 4 years.   Really effective new ones pop up every single draft now in the later rounds.   I’d hate to spend the 6th pick on someone that it probably doesn’t make sense to extend beyond their rookie deal.  

It does sound like you are off the idea of spending 6 on him so maybe it makes more sense at 18 but I still think they need to place their 1st round bets in other areas.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tyree Wilson could be an option for them at 6. I would guess it depends on if they bring back Cominsky and/or Okwara though. Even if he is there that may be a trade back possibility.

As far a CB's go i think there is Porter/Gonzales/Weatherspoon and then a drop off for the next level. If they want a CB1 they may have to get him with their first pick, because those 3 may be gone by 18. 

Edited by Stanley70
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hongbit said:

I’d love to add the next Alvin Kamara to this offense.   I want them to find him in the 3rd round just like the Saints did with Kamara.   These guys are so fragile and the shelf life is short that it adds to the risk of taking one so high.  Even if they don’t bust, the durability on almost all of them is so low.   Barkley and CMC are great players taken top 10 but both have been injured and played in less than 75% of games which is less reliable than Swift, who you guys already complain about missing too many games.   

In today’s NFL, I’m not so sure it’s even a good idea to ever sign a RB to a 2nd contract.    The fall off is so quick along with damage that it seems best to draft them outside the first and keep changing out every 4 years.   Really effective new ones pop up every single draft now in the later rounds.   I’d hate to spend the 6th pick on someone that it probably doesn’t make sense to extend beyond their rookie deal.  

It does sound like you are off the idea of spending 6 on him so maybe it makes more sense at 18 but I still think they need to place their 1st round bets in other areas.  
 

 

barkley played every game last year but one.

additionally, when barkley plays, he plays 80-90% of the offensive snaps.  swift rarely plays more than 40% of the lions snaps.  in fact, in many of the games where he "played", he was 1) unproductive; and 2) played about 1/3 of the offensive plays.

your insistence that because swift "played" in games means he's not unreliable because of injury is puzzling.  swift played well in a handful of games last year.  other than that, he was not used much.  he is a glorified third down back and not a back like barkley or potentially robinson.

swift is in a contract year, so we'll see if he can play through enough pain to get paid after this year.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading up on the updated beliefs from the evaluators post combine and more than one has said that they think a bunch of rbs may fly off the board in rds 2-3 cause there are several really good ones apparently but the consensus is that Bijan is the 1A and Gibbs being a little behind then.

Maybe they pass on Bijan at 6 and just wait till 18 knowing that the other elite one in Gibbs should be there at the very least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, buddha said:

barkley played every game last year but one.

additionally, when barkley plays, he plays 80-90% of the offensive snaps.  swift rarely plays more than 40% of the lions snaps.  in fact, in many of the games where he "played", he was 1) unproductive; and 2) played about 1/3 of the offensive plays.

your insistence that because swift "played" in games means he's not unreliable because of injury is puzzling.  swift played well in a handful of games last year.  other than that, he was not used much.  he is a glorified third down back and not a back like barkley or potentially robinson.

swift is in a contract year, so we'll see if he can play through enough pain to get paid after this year.

I don’t want them to resign Swift.    I just think he gets a bad rap from fans for being unreliable and underperforming.  He’s the best back the team has drafted since Barry.  That includes about 30 different players.   Go ahead and nitpick the names.  30 players drafted over 30 years is alot.

How the team chooses to use him is great.  80% of plays is too much wear and tear and the Giants will regret that number.  Good teams have a reliable 2nd and 3rd back.  That is no knock on Swift.  

There have been maybe three games in his career where they have trotted him out as mainly a decoy while he wasn’t fully able to play.   It’s very much the exception and not the rule yet you keep bringing these situations up because it sounds believable.  


 

 

Edited by Hongbit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

I don’t want them to resign Swift.    I just think he gets a bad rap from fans for being unreliable and underperforming.  He’s the best back the team has drafted since Barry.  That includes about 30 different players.   Go ahead and nitpick the names.  30 players drafted over 30 years is alot.

How the team chooses to use him is great.  80% of plays is too much wear and tear and the Giants will regret that number.  Good teams have a reliable 2nd and 3rd back.  That is no knock on Swift.  

There have been maybe three games in his career where they have trotted him out as mainly a decoy while he wasn’t fully able to play.   It’s very much the exception and not the rule yet you keep bringing these situations up because it sounds believable.  


 

 

i dont bring it up "because it sounds believable," i bring it up because i watch the games and i see how he plays.  there is a big difference between swift playing hard and running strong and swift looking for contact and playing weak and busting everything outside.

he played more than half the lions' snaps in 5 games last year.  one was the first game of the year when he was healthy and played extremely well.  after that washington game in week 2?  not so much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hongbit said:

I’d love to add the next Alvin Kamara to this offense.   I want them to find him in the 3rd round just like the Saints did with Kamara.   These guys are so fragile and the shelf life is short that it adds to the risk of taking one so high.  Even if they don’t bust, the durability on almost all of them is so low.   Barkley and CMC are great players taken top 10 but both have been injured and played in less than 75% of games which is less reliable than Swift, who you guys already complain about missing too many games.   

In today’s NFL, I’m not so sure it’s even a good idea to ever sign a RB to a 2nd contract.    The fall off is so quick along with damage that it seems best to draft them outside the first and keep changing out every 4 years.   Really effective new ones pop up every single draft now in the later rounds.   I’d hate to spend the 6th pick on someone that it probably doesn’t make sense to extend beyond their rookie deal.  

It does sound like you are off the idea of spending 6 on him so maybe it makes more sense at 18 but I still think they need to place their 1st round bets in other areas.  

In fairness, I believe Kamara fell inexplicably in 2017. He was projected as a late 1st or early 2nd, similar to Gibbs right now. As buddha said, we have differences of opinion about Swift's durability. I think the fact that Jamaal Williams was able to break the franchise record for TDs in a season as RB2 speaks more to Swift's absence than it does Williams' presence (though Jamaal being the goalline back.

I tend to agree about not re-signing workhorse running backs, but I think the way to do it is to draft your RB1 pretty high every 3-5 years or so. Maybe not always 1st round, but high enough that you're getting a playmaker like Kamara, CMC, Barkley, or DHen. Then when their rookie contract is up, let someone else pay them. Even if we put Swift in that group, the time to replace him probably is now, before his 4th season, with five picks in the first 85, and when Swift might still have some marginal trade value (3rd or 4th round pick maybe?).

I wouldn't be thrilled with taking him at 6, but I would understand it if both Wilson and Anderson are off the board and trading down is not an option. There's not a lot of tremendous value elsewhere, and if he's the #1 guy on your big board, I get it... I am warming to Jahmyr Gibbs, and would probably be okay with a strategy of sitting at 18 and taking Bijan if he's there, Gibbs if he's not... I don't see that kind of difference maker in Charbonnet, McIntosh, Achane, et al.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      282
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Jeff M
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...