Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The calculus is that the hard core right is betting the rest of the causus would rather cave and support them than agree to any coalition with the dems. And I would say that in the end that is probably good bet. The GOP middle has already shown itself to be spineless in their handling of Trump, and the threat of being primaried if they voted for a coalition Speaker will eventually carry the day.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
2 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

 

One or two Congresses ago I'd have bet on this outcome, but I'm not sure there are enough GOP members sympathtic to this view left, or whose seats would be safe enough if they adopted it.

Posted
13 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

So there are 19 members who really don't want to govern. And don't want anyone else to govern either. 

High school stuff...

Honestly, I would have thought the number to be way higher than nineteen.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

The crazies are in charge. The rest of the party has no spine. And the voters, for the most part, don't give a shit.

 

the truth is that not much usually happens legislatively in the 2nd half of a presidential term anyway. The dems control appointments and they got the budget they wanted this year - Jordan's threat of two full years of nothing but continuing resolutions will be no skin off the Democrats' noses.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
1 minute ago, chasfh said:

Honestly, I would have thought the number to be way higher than nineteen.

Probably are (see MTG) but they've been bought off like the frauds they really are. The 19 are the True Believers in Orbanism

Posted
1 minute ago, gehringer_2 said:

the truth is that not much usually happens legislatively in the 2nd half of a presidential term anyway. They got the budget they wanted this year - Jeffries' threat of two full years of nothing but continuing resolutions will be no skin off the Democrats' noses.

If anything maybe two years of having Jefferies front and center for the Democrats might give Dems a tru successor to Biden if he decides not to run.

Posted
5 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Honestly, I would have thought the number to be way higher than nineteen.

I think it is higher than 19 (around 30 IIRC) but several have chickened out (Jordan, MTG, etc.) and gone over to McCarthy already in this game of chicken...

Posted
1 minute ago, CMRivdogs said:

If anything maybe two years of having Jefferies front and center for the Democrats might give Dems a tru successor to Biden if he decides not to run.

and again, the GOP would much rather run against the size of a budget than acutally cut one, so they don't *really* care either.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CMRivdogs said:

I tend to doubt this would change anything. The FAUX Bomb Throwers are more likely to throw Kevin under the bus

 

Interesting call for Murdoch. McCarthy is Trump's man and supposedly Murdoch is done with Trump.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

 

Yeah, it's way too early for that.

It's going to take at least a couple weeks of this dysfunction before the Scalise/ Upton rumors have any chance of gaining legs...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by 1984Echoes
Posted
1 minute ago, 1984Echoes said:

Yeah, it's way too early for that.

It's going to take at least a couple weeks of this dysfunction before the Scalise/ Upton rumors have any chance of gaining legs...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When does the current budget run out of money and the country declares bankrupcy?

Of Course the usual suspects will blame Biden even though the Congress controls the purse strings

Posted

Well...

The middle has fallen back into line behind him.

It's only 19 hardcore Fascists (Trumpists) that are refusing to fall in line. Because he's not Trumpy/ Fascist enough.

I think it's true that he's proven himself wishy-washy... 

We'll see where that gets him.

Posted
1 minute ago, CMRivdogs said:

When does the current budget run out of money and the country declares bankrupcy?

Of Course the usual suspects will blame Biden even though the Congress controls the purse strings

The budget is this September. That's what the $1.7 Trill bought: time.

I'm not certain when the debt limit comes up. That will certainly be a major push on the Pubs to get their shit together.

Posted
Just now, oblong said:

Scalise is now talking and somehow blaming Democrats.

 

He' supposed to be more moderate than McCarthy, and more willing to work on legislature/ etc. with Dems.

I don't know how true that is in reality.

I'm certain any speeches he gives are more performative than legislative impact...

I just don't know by how much...

Posted
1 minute ago, oblong said:

Scalise is now talking and somehow blaming Democrats.

 

It's always the Democrats' fault...The GOP is the Party of No Responsibility. All the popular radio and TV talkshow hosts have told us that for 35 plus years

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      292
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...