Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Deleterious said:

Nobody could write articles about the Spurs taking someone other than Victor.  So they did it with Scoot.  He was always going to be #2.

 

I heard Brian Windhorst suggest that San Antonio is trying to get into position to take Coulibaly.

So, if the Pistons were to deal #5 to Utah for #9 & #16, is there anything that makes any sense to move #9 to San Antonio?  They have #33 & #44, but those would only be additions rather than principals.  Does it make sense to move #9 for San Antonio's (unprotected) 1st next season?

Posted
5 minutes ago, casimir said:

I heard Brian Windhorst suggest that San Antonio is trying to get into position to take Coulibaly.

So, if the Pistons were to deal #5 to Utah for #9 & #16, is there anything that makes any sense to move #9 to San Antonio?  They have #33 & #44, but those would only be additions rather than principals.  Does it make sense to move #9 for San Antonio's (unprotected) 1st next season?

Not really.  Next years draft is supposed to be weaker and you figure with two lottery picks SA will improve a bit.  I would rather have this years pick.  

Another option.  SA is owed 7 future first round picks from other teams.  Maybe one or two of those would be appealing.  Except Detroit really needs the help now.

Posted
16 minutes ago, casimir said:

I heard Brian Windhorst suggest that San Antonio is trying to get into position to take Coulibaly.

So, if the Pistons were to deal #5 to Utah for #9 & #16, is there anything that makes any sense to move #9 to San Antonio?  They have #33 & #44, but those would only be additions rather than principals.  Does it make sense to move #9 for San Antonio's (unprotected) 1st next season?

if they want a french guy for wemby to pal around with, we can give them killian!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

I'm ignorant on basketball knowledge compared to most here in the forum. But everything I read online about Gradey D. and everything I watch highlight wise makes me feel like he's Luke Kennard 2.0. Am I wrong in thinking this? How his Gradey different that Luke? As a reviewer on SB Nation put it he doesn't seem to have elite athleticism, a quick first step, length, great ball-handling skills , be an elite passer, or have the ability to draw fouls. He seems like a very talented spot shooter, who doesn't create his own shots, offering little else. How is that not Kennard 2.0?

Yep.

So I'd rather draft Ben Sheppard than Gradey D.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      292
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...