Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Mr.TaterSalad said:

Quentin Johnston come on down at #18.

for a guy who didnt like ebron because of his hands, you want to take a guy who also has suspect hands at 18?

they did pretty well without jamo last year.  its a kick in the nuts because of how he hopefully would have made them better, but you work through it.  hope the nfl gives them some easier games at home to start the season.

Posted

I just liked the threat of Jamo, even if he didn't put up big numbers I thought he would still help the offense greatly because of his speed. 

Oh well atleast its only 6 games, hopefully theyll be fine. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, buddha said:

for a guy who didnt like ebron because of his hands, you want to take a guy who also has suspect hands at 18?

they did pretty well without jamo last year.  its a kick in the nuts because of how he hopefully would have made them better, but you work through it.  hope the nfl gives them some easier games at home to start the season.

It's a significant concern for sure. In the case of Ebron though there was also concerns regarding his maturity and ability to run routes, which I don't believe is there for Johnston. But yes, I am concerned with his 11% college drop rate. 

Posted

betting on non-nfl games at the facility?  are they allowed to bet on anything at all?  was it because it was AT the facility?

if its just because they were at the facility, it seems kind of dumb...

Posted
1 minute ago, RandyMarsh said:

I dont see why it should make a diff where you gamble at but rules are rules and if he knew that and still did it then I have to question his intelligence.

at the very least, it shows a lot of immaturity.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, buddha said:

betting on non-nfl games at the facility?  are they allowed to bet on anything at all?  was it because it was AT the facility?

if its just because they were at the facility, it seems kind of dumb...

I believe with Williams it was because he was at the facility. As I understand it, betting on NFL games is banned so that's why Cephus and Moore got idefinite. Williams got 6 games because he was betting on non NFL games which is allowed but not on NFL or team property. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

It's a significant concern for sure. In the case of Ebron though there was also concerns regarding his maturity and ability to run routes, which I don't believe is there for Johnston. But yes, I am concerned with his 11% college drop rate. 

i dont know if there is an "x" receiver you take high in this draft.

i still think that if theyre going to take any receiver, JSN is the guy to take.  osu qbs may suck but osu receivers are the real deal.  JSN will be too.

you might have to stay ahead of the bears to do it.

Posted
Just now, buddha said:

i dont know if there is an "x" receiver you take high in this draft.

Then do you trade for Hopkins or someone else or just ride the wave of 6 games with who you got and maybe a 3rd or later round pick?

Posted
3 minutes ago, buddha said:

betting on non-nfl games at the facility?  are they allowed to bet on anything at all?  was it because it was AT the facility?

if its just because they were at the facility, it seems kind of dumb...

Gambling rules clearly stated here.

https://nflcommunications.com/Documents/2018 Policies/2018 Gambling Policy - FINAL.pdf

Quote

Gambling in the Workplace: NFL Personnel shall not engage in any form of gambling while in any Club or League setting including, without limitation, locker rooms, practice or office facilities, team buses, trains, flights, or hotels, or while traveling on Club or League business. For clarity, playing cards or other casino-type games is permitted as long as nothing of value is wagered.
 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

I believe with Williams it was because he was at the facility. As I understand it, betting on NFL games is banned so that's why Cephus and Moore got idefinite. Williams got 6 games because he was betting on non NFL games which is allowed but not on NFL or team property. 

Six games seems a bit much for a first-time offense on something that would be legal if done a couple hundred yards from wherever he was sitting.

Posted
1 minute ago, MichiganCardinal said:

Six games seems a bit much for a first-time offense on something that would be legal if done a couple hundred yards from wherever he was sitting.

yup.  seems dumb. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, MichiganCardinal said:

Six games seems a bit much for a first-time offense on something that would be legal if done a couple hundred yards from wherever he was sitting.

That's true of any workplace through. There are certain rules such as don't drink on the job. Off site ok, work hours not so much.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      288
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Dr. Bob
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...